Poluxy river man and dino tracks...again?

Question

Ok creo's and evo's we all know about poluxy and we know what it shows giant man and dino tracks

creos claim it wasa giant man as the atmosphere would support giant lizards, beavers, rhinos which have all been found, so any men around would have been giants too


but lets not babble.

Why do evolutionists simply test this rock and some of the footprints and give us a date?

Why do they never test creo evidence

Just radiodate using some of your methods and tell us what you get

there must be evo scientists with dating techniques in their labs from america repsonding to this question

so why not test the footprints and give us a date for them

that would **** up one group of people

does anyone know why these footprints have not been tested

will someone please test those footprints, using any method you like

at the same time can you also test the mayan claypots, which show the mayans riding on the backs of dinosaurs too
thanks

lets test these things and get an answer for everybody

John: that test is called satellites,

The romans did not think the world was flat and sailed to britain

neither did the persians

or the greeks

or the polynesians who founded new zealands

only those they tried to restrict to their own lands in the days of columbus for fear of claiming the new world for themselves

they are doing the same with climate change, fear of travel

John....

So why not test the tracks so we can all have a rest, you got the science, you got the testing kits, we got the tracks, test them and make us close our mouths

Oh i see Dendron

They are laughably ridiculous, but they can't be tested

not out of your comfort zone yet

if they are ridiculous lets test them to see just how ridiculous you are

you have nothing to lose

we can't compare rock with rock just becuase it's lying next to each other, glaciation deposits rocks from different lands on different land masses,
thats how rocks from sweden end up in ireland

it's amazing how evo scientists with all their experiments don't want to test the creo's evidence whenever it turns up,

lets just test it and end the arguement!

Let science do the talking

Answer 1

Oh, for goodness' sake, just give it up; ask yourself if you really would change your beliefs because somebody showed you some sort of proof that your assumptions were wrong. The time difference between the last known dinosaurs and the first known protohominids, let alone humans, is so vast that only a fool would think they coexisted. You might as well demand some sort of scientific test be done to demonstrate that the Earth is round, so that we can settle that pesky 'flat-Earth' conflict once and for all.

Answer 2

Not all rocks can be radiometrically dated. What you do is find some rocks that can be dated and compare them to the same rock strata your fossils are found in. This has been done, showing the strata in question is some 120 million years old. Creationists have argued that the presence of human foorprints argues that radiometric dating is thus false. However, if one takes a look at the so-called human footprints (there's lots of photos around) it is easy to see that they are not really human footprints at all. Paleontologists have pointed that out and that is why the Poluxy footprints are considered a laughably ridiculous creationist argument.

Answer 3

I think you mean the Paluxy river.

Basically, there were prints that merely looked like human prints and prints that were witnessed being forged. Neither of which are human foot prints so the rest of the argument was pretty moot.

There are other methods to dating strata than just radiometric, including studying the inset fossils within the rock and the surrounding strata, as well as the surrounding strata itself. It's the combination of these that gives a fairly accurate date or at least time period for the rock.

Answer 4

How do you recognize they dropped lifeless contained for the duration of a village? what number human fossils have been cutting-edge in close proximity to that of a Dinosaur? I do have faith that the Dinos are not as old because of fact the scientists say. basically like the Spinx. that could be a lot older than that is recorded.