Which US President has presided over the most US casualties from hostile forces, since President Nixon?

Answer 1

George W, Bush has brought us by far the most war casualties since Nixon.

4000 dead, over 100,000 serious, long-term injuries.

Answer 2

I don't think, that Bush is behind Nixon in death and wounded. Afghanistan, still ongoing Kosovo, Haiti, and Iraq have cost the lives of 6000 US soldiers since 2001, 160,000 wounded, 2300 US civilians killed, 480 Allies (English, Canada, Australia, Germany) bombed "accidentally" to death by the USA in the 4 conflicts. The Vietnam war cost 50,000 lives over 26 years, that's 2000 a year, but under Nixon, it was less, around the same as Bush's victims. It's a race until 2009. I bet on Bush coming out on top. If you ad the terror casualties from 9/11 under Bushs watch, its a gimmy for Bush.

Answer 3

Bush 43. Over 3000 from 911 and almost 4000 from Iraq and Afghanistan. Of course the war on terror has lasted a lot longer than WWII where we lost at least 3 to 4 hundred thousand lives and possible would have lost at least a half a million if we would not have used the A-Bomb.
I Cr 13;8a

Answer 4

First let's set the record straight, Iraqi War Causalities.

Total Dead to date: 3834 Combat Deaths: 3149
Total Wounded : 28276

With that cleared up, The obvious answer is Bush. But let's include all Presidents. The answer is Lincoln. Good thing he was willing to pay the price though, wasn't it.

Answer 5

George W.Bush.

That whole Bill Clinton agitprop popped up last year,and it was proven with the DoD's own numbers that total under Clinton was 1.

Answer 6

Nixon become fully corrupt and incompetent (his value controls and abandonment of the main useful created a hyperinflationary melancholy and his coverage of consistent the warfare on Vietnam brought about the pointless deaths of distinctive Vietnamese and individuals). for the reason that Nixon, the excellent president is probable the two Ford or Carter, besides the incontrovertible fact that neither of them have been stable presidents. Ronald Reagan become a huge government fraud who lower back and lower back raised taxes (beginning in 1981, falsely bearing on his tax advance as a "tax decrease"; he later raised taxes lower back and lower back to "offset" this meant "tax decrease") and ran spending throughout the roof. George HW Bush endured Reagan's coverage of tax will advance and instructed Saddam Hussein to invade Kuwait previously he desperate to attack Iraq for invading Kuwait. bill Clinton raised taxes, engaged in an arson attack on a non secular team (the dep. Davidians), promoted bigotry against the greater youthful, and waged consistent wars (at one element, his Secretary of State Madeline Albright while stated that Clinton's Iraq sanctions brought about the dying of 500,000 Iraqi infants suggested it become "well worth it"; she's now area of Barack Obama's distant places coverage advisory team which will desire to coach merely how plenty "substitute" President Obama is going to hold to Washington). George W Bush become warned that 9/11 become going to take place and ignored it (he won a memo a pair of month ahead that suggested "Bin weighted down desperate to strike interior of US" and then went on trip and look at My puppy Goat to an simple college classification whilst the blowback for his predecessors' distant places coverage aggression become taking place), then used 9/11 to pass fascist anti-civil liberties regulations and salary wars against harmless civilians in Iraq and Afganistan. Bush has additionally grown the government greater beneficial than any president for the reason that his non secular predecessor LBJ. for sure, Ford pardoned his offender predecessor and Carter re-conventional the Selective Slavery device that Ford had abolished. i assume I would desire to flow with Ford as Ford abolished militia slavery besides the incontrovertible fact that Carter has performed a great number of great artwork for the reason that leaving the White homestead to greater beneficial than make up for the harm he did whilst he become president.

Answer 7

Dubya

Answer 8

Little Bush.

Answer 9

LOL
Since people die during war more than they do when there is not a war, I can't believe you can't see the nonsense of your question.

Answer 10

Somewhat biased, I would have gone back to LBJ.