2007-10-22 02:10:09 · 20 answers · asked by Strats!! 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Both the Clintons are sell-outs. Ever wonder why you see so many Chinese in this country over the last 10-12 years? Bill and Hillary would sell out anyone for a buck their country included. Hillary is a female elitist, of the University of Chicago feminist lawyer clique mold. She feels she is superior to everyone and wants to save them from themselves. She'll do anything to do it. Ask youself, do you really want to subsidize through a payroll tax, the medical bills of the fat, fast food eating, smoking, walking heart attack, diabetes patient waiting to happen that you see walking down the street and in the car next to you? Multiply that times all the fat assed kids growing up now and you'll get an idea of what's waiting for you if you let Hillary have her way. Compassion is great, but let's index medical insurance taxes and premiums to a pre-insurance screening. Just like car insurance. If you are medical accident waiting to happen, you pay out the *** for coverage...wait don't we have that now? Great, so they want to just give the medical wrecks a free ride...beautiful. You think we have a problem with illegals now? Wait till insurance is free....
2007-10-22 02:20:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
If you have evidence of that, I would love for you to post your source.
However, in answer to your question, if it were verified that she was being funded in part by the Chinese government, I would not even consider voting for her.
added later------------
To Johnny & nigelshiftright (who answered below me). Hillary decribes herself as a "progressive". If you study history, you'll see the term originated around the time of FDR, who described himself that way. Many of his (at that time) radical ideas of changing government and growing government actually came from his assistant William Bullitt visiting Russia and meeting with Stalin. Many of the concepts of "The New Deal" came right out of the Socialist handbook. So yes, she is pretty much a self-proclaimed socialist.
added later still---------------------
oldernwiser - I don't think anyone is questioning Hillary's intelligence. Certainly Bush is proof that you don't have to be overly intelligent to be President. I also don't see anyone who is bashing her for being a woman or being confident. Hopefully you are NOT voting for her because she is a woman either. Anyone who votes for person primarily because of their race or sex is hopelessly naive, and probably beyond the help of Yahoo Answers.
People are bashing Hillary because unlike her husband, but like her "progressive" predecessors, she will bankrupt this country even more than Bush, grow government even larger and possibly usher in a new "great depression" just like the last president who was a progressive. I agree our current administration is not doing a good job, and I agree our country needs a change. But Hillary is NOT it.
You should also care A LOT about where candidates funds come from as that obviously will have an influence on the direction they will take with regards to that particular entity. China will soon become the biggest polluter on the planet, with all the lead recalls obviously has little regard for human (especially child) safety, and has one of the worst human rights violations on the planet. She may as well have accepted funds from the KKK and Osama Bin Laden as far as I'm concerned.
2007-10-22 09:13:14 · answer #2 · answered by whiskeyman510 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just one more reason in a LONG list of reasons why I would never vote for that evil, self-serving, socialist witch.
Johnny, if you do not realize that Hillary is a socialist, then you have no idea what a socialist is. She is a textbook socialist. Her entitlement ideas, he health care plan, her "it takes a village to raise a child" mentality...pure socialism.
Mir...are you with the Chinese government? Because if you do not care that she got donations from there, you are NOT American.
nigel...Your take on Christianity shows that you should not speak of that which you do not understand. The Bible is specific that the only justified reason for divorce is adultery, and that you DO NOT TAKE THEM BACK if they have committed adultery.
oldernsenile...What you call progressive is pure socialism...You want socialism go to a socialist country. Not wrapped up in greed???? That is the funniest BS comment of the day. If she were not, why would she be trying to sell us out to China as Bill did. She could not care less about this country, and nobody is frightened by an intelligent woman...just a criminal socialist witch. If she does get elected, COUNT on a HUGE recession. A combination of her huge tax increases, and investment money leaving this country as quick as lightening in order to avoid those INSANE taxes, would put us into a recession, possibly depression.
2007-10-22 09:12:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton is the future of this country. Her thoughts are progressive and I would never consider NOT voting for her. She is the only choice to pull this country out of the horrendous place Bush has put it. She is not wrapped up in greed, race or anything else. She just cares about this country. I don't care WHERE some of her campaign funds have come from. I just wish I had more to donate to her. I've consistently given to her campaign. What a shame that so many of you are frightened of an intelligent, confident woman.
2007-10-22 09:46:07 · answer #4 · answered by oldernwiser 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If her funds honestly came from the Chinese government, you would have to know they are expecting something in return. Probably our jobs being sent there.
2007-10-22 09:14:12 · answer #5 · answered by Harley Lady 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I would not vote for Hillary if she were the only person running. If Hillary wins, we might as well hang a for rent sign on the White House. She will sell favors, pardons, etc... to the highest bidders. When are people going to realize that Hillary is like a flame and we are all moths. Eventually we will get too close and she will burn us all.
2007-10-22 09:16:27 · answer #6 · answered by The Oracle of Delphi 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I would never vote for Hillary Clinton. I am not apposed to a woman holding office, but if she can excuse her husband for betraying her in the most intimate of circumstances to advance her political career you know she gives less than a f*ck about any of us.
2007-10-22 09:27:03 · answer #7 · answered by Confirmed Bachelor 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.
Would never vote for her.
I'ts a wasted vote.
Especially now if her support is from the chinese Government.
2007-10-22 09:14:45 · answer #8 · answered by alotok 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I would not vote for her for so many reason, but this is definitely one of them. Her face should be on a wanted poster, mug shot, etc. It should not be on a campaign poster.
2007-10-22 09:29:54 · answer #9 · answered by A Human Bean 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I never in a million years would vote for her anyway.
2007-10-22 09:30:32 · answer #10 · answered by mountaindew25 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋