Strange how the 'peace loving', talk everything out' with our enemies, 'cumbya singing' libs are the first to riot, threaten, pie throw, spit, use profanity, camp out and do every other annoying violent thing to get their stupid point across.
2007-10-21 23:55:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
Any death threats are purely rhetorical and not literal. The Bush administration and by extension Bush himself have elicited little more than contempt for their arrogant disregard of American values and the Constitution. Now, I am certain that death wishes may well be harbored by many of those whose lives have been drastically altered on the tomb of this Imperial presidency.
2007-10-22 01:04:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by emiliosailez 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have not seen any threats to any presidents life so what are you talking about? This thug in office is a thug not on any hit list I know of. He should be tried for crimes against Americans.
2007-10-22 00:07:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by joyce s 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
i could have a concern with the people he killed in the event that they had no longer first recanted their American citizenship and reported that their purpose grew to become into to convey down u.s.. Then there is the criminal tangle you get into in case you insist that no enemy be killed without trial. How could that artwork in wartime?
2016-10-07 09:26:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by wilfrid 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I imagine anyone that thinks it's a good idea to kill the president doesn't understand that the vice-president would get his job.
2007-10-22 00:11:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by mick t 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I haven't seen any death threats on this site, and if there are they should be reported. I think you are making this up so you can all feel sorry for yourself. Typical straw man tactics.
2007-10-22 00:00:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I have only seen two here in one and a half year's time. One was withdrawn by the questioner, and I reported the other one. You should report any you see.
To answer your question: This doesn't happen very often, but the reason is the same reason why you ask this question: to get attention.
2007-10-21 23:45:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Those advocating a death of the President are those who suffer direct injury from acts arising from erroneous Presidential errors.
2007-10-21 23:41:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
4⤊
4⤋
well, many people think he didn't even legitimately win the election...so in relative context...to them he's not the president...I say he's the president...even if it's just something that's socially accepted and not really proven...i only wish to see him and Cheney and Condie on a FAIR trial for crimes against humanity.
2007-10-21 23:44:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
That's the kind of stupidity you find among some of these BDS crackpots.
2007-10-21 23:46:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋