Would you read a history book if things were found out to be wrong?

Question

I have read evidence that the story of TROY was off in location. I wont go into it but i have reason to belive it was not between the Greeks and Troy, but between the Celtics and a place called TROAD, which happened to have a city also called Illium as its capitol. it is said today to be the ruins near Cornwall, England.

anyway, there are many things in history that are disputed and i am curious if they were found to be differnt what would you think?

Answer 1

History books get things wrong all the time. History is written by the winners of the battle.

Will you be writing a book about Troad?

Answer 2

Most history books are wrong in one way or the other. First of all the history is most often written by the winners and survivors and by that the history becomes very one sided. As you know there is my truth, your truth, the witnesses truth and then what really happened.

As long as the author can back up the writings with facts then I'm likely to keep on reading. If the errors are ridiculous and shows that the author has no knowledge or very little knowledge about the topic then I'm more likely to put the book down.

Reading about historical events is like building a giant dynamic puzzle with stories, ideas and theories. If fact changes one of the theoretical puzzle pieces then adjust accordingly and keep on learning.

Answer 3

I'm a history buff, I've read a lot of history in college and beyond, and, at age sixty-one, I've been present at a lot of events that have become history.

No one, single source ever gets it completely right. That's one of the reasons that I enjoy history so much. Everyone has a different vantage point for the same event, and you can read as many accounts of the event as you like without getting the "real" story. You shouldn't expect to. The best you can ever hope for is a closer approximation of the truth.

Answer 4

What grew to become into the call of the conflict deliver sunk close to Japan? the single whose squaddies have been rescued by making use of the jap? nicely, after that, i don't be attentive to we had any relatives different than the mundane. As of as we talk, Japan is an exporter of goods, we are an importer. we've jap classes in some technical universities (a number of my acquaintances took them as greater, the place I took historic previous of artwork). our toddlers watch Japanase cartoons. we've some jap travelers come for lifestyle tourism. So, it form of feels, we are ordinarily on the receiving end of those relatives. in line with probability, with time, while/if jap take an interest in Turkish historic previous and lifestyle, we could start up sending products and people. Oh, and there grew to become into the final Samurai the sequence of direction. With Richard Chamberlain? We had found out extremely some jap words then.

Answer 5

you've been reading Iman Jacob Wilkens work. It's interesting and does make some good points except he misses the point that the location of Troy in turkey is believed to be already discovered.

If you read both sides to the stories the truth is usually somewhere in the middle.

Answer 6

History is no longer just written by "the winners."
I think it is time to put that worn-out cliche to rest, don't you? Today, History is also written by objective scholarly authors.

I have recently read a book in which things were later found out to be wrong. I learned that if we look back into the present we will still see connections and patterns that continue all the way to the present day. I read most of the 'Malleus Maleficarum' - and found much of what was written later turned out to be wrong.

To answer your question about TROAD, we can also read Geoffrey of Monmouth's 'The History of the Kings of Britain' and find out "things were found out to be wrong" too.