I own Carlton Sheets Investment Program and have listened to it at least 2 times and read through the manuals at least once. There are some good ideas and principals in his stuff.
I don't know that a lot of the core premises could be worked out in real life at least not to the spectacular results that are shown on TV. It would definitely take a very slow market (which we have currently in many areas of the country) and A LOT of failed attempts before a deal could work (there are some things suggested in the course which could potentially land you in legal trouble, so check your state laws especially on getting money back out of deals).
The BEST thing about the course is that it gets you to think outside the box. It is expensive and perhaps not worth the money for the average person though. I purchased my personal residence using some techniques that are described in the course, however I knew these techniques before purchasing the course as many good REALTORs would.
In my opinion, bottom line, investing in real estate without having money or partners with money is a VERY risky game. Talk to people who are in it. Try talking to an agent that works with investors.
For a less expensive look at investing in real estate buy a book at Barnes & Noble or such, I really like Investing In Fixer Uppers by Jay DeCima.
2007-10-22 06:17:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by DP1980 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Carlton Sheets himself has had GREAT success earning money from his program (by selling it). Most others lost substantial money learning that the program is not worth the investment. This applies not only to Sheets, but to John Beck and numerous similar others hawking such programs.
Save your money.
2007-10-22 01:01:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by acermill 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
20 years in the past i bought the application and was once ready to make a few cash. it's tough paintings and also you fairly need to keep in your sport plan. sure it did difference my lifestyles.i possess a couple of properies and feature a healthful coins waft.
2016-09-05 19:26:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋