In fact, all of the Republican candidates (with the exception of the Timothy Leary double) consistently acknowledge the religious extraction of America's enemies. So why do the Democratic hopefuls avoid a similar designation when asked about the threat our nation is confronted with?
Are they courting the vote of terrorist sympathizers?
2007-10-21 17:51:31 · 17 answers · asked by Kubla Con 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For political purposes, the Democrats deny the existence of Islamo-fascists. They can not be elected if there is any perceived threat that cannot be handled as a simple crime.
Traditionally, national security is not very high on the Democrat agenda.
.
2007-10-22 02:51:11 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Amazing how many idiots do not know what fascism is. Very depressing to think that some of them will find their way to voting booths.
I'd be ashamed to mouth of with so little brain power.
Fundamentalism is the operative word. Religious fanatics are the most dangerous people in the world and the followers of Islam do not have a monopoly on that.
2007-10-22 19:43:10 · answer #2 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because bleeding heart liberals think the term is offensive and casts the Islamic religion in a negative light.... Such pansies! They are more worried about being PC than confronting the real issue.
What's real sad, is the Islamofascists themselves incorporate the word Islam when referring to themselves. They call themselves Islamic Jihadists...... The left is completely incompetent and irrational.
2007-10-22 03:27:10 · answer #3 · answered by Ninja Rabbit 007 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
you wouldn't be talking about those Islamofascists that are in the process of building a refinery to supply us gasoline would you?
or maybe the Islamofascists that offered to send troops into Iraq?
Or maybe those islamofascists who are running anti-terror media campaigns to make the ultra-conservative fundies of islam realize that this violence wasn't sanctioned by Islam?
Or maybe it might be those Islamofascists that your type keeps defending, when it comes to crying about a dem conspiracy of reviewing the Armenian genocide bill?
which Islamofascists is he talking about hmmm?
could it be the Islamofascists that Bush was going to allow to buy several US ports?
Or maybe the Islamofascists that were elected to run the Iraq government?
just which islamofascists is he referring to???!?!?!?!
Oh oh maybe the Islamofascists that reagan supplied with weapons??
2007-10-22 01:19:56 · answer #4 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Maybe they are just practicing restraint and avoiding paranoia. As if the Republicans should be calling anybody a fascist.
2007-10-22 01:12:23 · answer #5 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
A fascist believes in uniting business with government.
The term Islamofascist is embarrassing when anybody uses it. It was coined by and only appeals to the super-ignorant.
What I wonder about is why we act like the people who helped carry out 9/11 and continue to support the terrorists with mountains of cash are treated like friends.
The Saud family in particular. Dubai. Etc.
2007-10-22 01:00:07 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 6⤊ 5⤋
id say that "courting terrorist sympathizers" is a terrible campaign strategy, because i don't know one person who actually wants the terrorists to win. and the definition of terrorism has nothing to do with religious extremism. why does it matter what religion they are? are you suggesting that all muslims are the enemies of america?
2007-10-22 01:02:41 · answer #7 · answered by joshtheG 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Mike Huckabee says the world is 6,000 years old, How in the heck do we find Dinosaur bones that are 65 Million years if this true?? Like so many of the "Wrong wingers" his whole ideas are incorrect.
2007-10-22 00:58:33 · answer #8 · answered by poppawick 4 · 6⤊ 6⤋
High five to Huckabee and to all the ones that call terrorists "Islamo-fascists"! I call them that too because that's what they are. Complete bloody terrorists!
2007-10-22 01:06:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 5⤋
The republicans have resorted to fearmongering, because they know they will lose the election otherwise (shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic, in my opinion: even Yogi Berra nods).
2007-10-22 00:57:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 6⤋