About the North American Union? Do we really have a choice?

Question

I know some of us acknowledge it and complain a lot about it but Do we have a choice? Looks like no matter what continent you live on they are eventually going to be unions. The US is actually behind in the planning. Thats why there's so much upheaval in the world right now. There will eventually be 4 main continents. The EuropeanU, the AsianU, the AfricanU and the NorthAmericanU. This is too make it easier to implement a one-world government. I really don't see how the "little" people will make a dent in it. Even electing Ron Paul might slow it down but they won't give up. We are going to have to become the offensive side and keep voting their neo-con butts out of the government, but it will take a majority of informed voters to do it from now on and that goes for the whole world. For example the EU has been in place for several years now and already threatens our economy. If we have say 3 other currencies outnumbering ours we won't have a chance of surviving the imminent collapse of our economy and society as we know it. We're feeling the heat already from the Asian and European markets. I don't know who could even organize such a task of taking down the world-wide global elite but I do know that when the majority catch on to whats really going on it will probably be too late. Might as well sit back and enjoy the show.

I looked at your link Rocco but just on the first page it said the papers Building a North American Community was probably done by a bunch of eggheads from the Council on Foreign Relations. Tell us who these eggheads might be...lol

I'll tell you who these eggheads are. They're people like
Paul Wolfowitz
Colin Powell
Madeline Albright
Dick Cheney
Bill Clinton
George Soros
George Shultz
David Rockefeller
John. D Rockefeller
Condaleeza Rice
Norman Podhoretz (former editor-in-chief of "Commentary", senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, Project for the New American Century (PNAC) signatory)
Henry Paulson (United States Treasury Secretary)
Henry Kissinger
John Kerry
The list goes on and on... Sound like eggheads to you?

Answer 1

ron paul is the best chance to put a stop to it.

Answer 2

Hello.
I originated this site and it was intended to be about the European Union not the U S A. Having said that you do raise some interesting ideas.
One thing that needs to be thought about is what do you mean by governmernt? Surely government is on a continuum from the village pump the the whole world. The affairs that effect the village pump are not the same as those that should be considered at the United Nations.
Government should ,surely, be seen as being on a continuum from the village pump to the whole world and various governements are just noduals along that continuum.
The world is heading in that direction and for one I see nothing wrong in it. After all surely the things that affect Europe,and just Europe, should be settled in Europe and the same goes for any continent. These matter do not necessarily have to be settled on a continental bassis and often they are not. Surely it is better to have these instutions than to ga around the world settling things by war. All wars do is demonstrate who is the biggest bully. WW 2 excluded in that.
Cheers.
Ian.

Answer 3

A choice well in a sense - no , because 70 percent don't know it exists and 30 percent of those - believe its a lie .

The only problem I have with the North American is that the US Constitution will be null and void once this comes to be . By the way I watched Soylent Green great movie , thank you for telling me about it :)

Answer 4

I think we have a choice, Who benefits from a Union? The people making the rules, who is making the rules? The people printing the currency notes. unionizing north america would be the last hurdle in bringing in a one world monetary system.....this is why we have major declines in world history when nations get greedy, people get poorer and rules and laws become unjust.....it's no secret China is buying all the gold it can to solidify it's currency, were trying to do it with oil, and we dont even own it.....thank you richard nixon!
Ron Paul might not be able to change this trend in the world , be he can change things here.

Answer 5

You are American. You live in the land of the free. We will never be a Union. We have a consitituion and will never live under a Union.
You are perhaps a bit too concerned this. Cool your jets and reread the constitution. Watch C-Span for a while and you will see your government in action.
Be proud of your country!!!
God Bless America!!

Answer 6

Finally tonight, Gov Huckabee mentioned the Sea Bill Rights giveaway. He has shown to me he knows about these conspiratorial actions to give away our nation and its resources to international groups and the United Nations. We need to acknowledge him for this. He may be the one candidate we need to get the message out to the wider public. At this time I am NOW going to swing my support more his way until or unless a better candidate comes along. And it seems the social conservative groups (The old Silent Majority) is becoming more and more comfortable with him. My mouth dropped when he brought up that Hillary wants to give our rights to the open sea away. Good for him!

Answer 7

Ron Paul would never as president cede our rights over to a some EU state, it a fact Im voting for him because of that and many other things. GOOGLE Ron Paul do America a favor

Answer 8

no because they continue to vote for things that the majority of americans are against. Iraq and immigration both come to mind.

Answer 9

Yah, we have a choice, unless the GOP has finished shredding the US Constitution.

Answer 10

Not really. Unification of the human race in all of the world and the death of nationalism is guaranteed in our destiny. It has already happened in the economic world, now all that remains is selfish, greedy, and stupid politicans. National borders were originally created as a "divide and conquer" method to control human slavery.