English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

he is not performig well & giving lot of runs

2007-10-21 16:41:11 · 25 answers · asked by m.s.dhoni 2 in Sports Cricket

25 answers

if not bcci guys are imbiciles~

2007-10-21 16:51:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Shreesanth is a good bowler and has a good future in the game. But his behaviour in the ground gives raise to the doubt whether he is fit to for international tours! Cricket is considered as a Gentleman's' game, unlike rugby or football. This youngster should control his boyish enthusiasm and try to behave like a gentleman. He can take a lesson or two from Tendulkar in this regard.

2007-10-22 00:14:23 · answer #2 · answered by Brahmanyan 5 · 1 0

Yes,he should be selected for the Australia tour because he snapped up 6 for 55 against England, the best figures by an Indian fast bowler at home. Idiosyncratic, with an aggressive approach - to the stumps and the game - he can be expensive in one-dayers, but is also a wicket-taking bowler. He does it in Tests, too - in Antigua in June 2006 he fired out Ramnaresh Sarwan and Brian Lara (for 0) in successive overs, and then took five wickets in Jamaica and played a key role in firing India to a historic triumph . He consedes a lot of runs but takes a lot of wickets

2007-10-24 05:57:59 · answer #3 · answered by Deoxys 4 · 0 0

According to me no. He should not considered for australia tour. But here in India. Most of our fans having no cricketing sense. Here in India One match hero's are so popular. That is play one good innings and cement their place in the Indian team and Play 20 to 30 matches with worst performance. Sreesanth is one of one match hero's.
Sreesanth is Excellent actor. He is going on cheating the selectors by showing unneccessary aggression against aussies and create that he is aggressive bowler in selector's mind. He is working hard. But in reality he is not good bowler.
First sreesanth should bowl 10 overs for less than 30 runs and take 4 to 5 wickets consistantly for 5 to 6 matches.
Then he prove to the world he is not acting or cheating. He is really trying hard to earn his place in the team.
Excellent question. I personally congradulate for this question.
Like me you have excellent cricketing knowledge.
One thing is very clear, you are watching players performance very closely like me. You are not cricket mad like others.

2007-10-22 05:28:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Performance apart, his antics and mannerisms irritate the Indian fans more than others. He should not be considered for any level of cricket for at least 3 months, as a warning. Indians cricket fans are ashamed of his on-field behaviour.

2007-10-23 06:31:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes but only for 3 or 2 matches because he is not well behaving in field and giving so many runs and conceding many runs.

2007-10-22 07:28:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Though he give more runs he take good wickets, i think he should be considered to go for the australian tour.

2007-10-22 01:58:36 · answer #7 · answered by Nafeez Nash 6 · 0 0

I think he should be considered as he has talent and can be groomed up as a good bowler if properly nurtured

2007-10-22 00:00:53 · answer #8 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1 0

ya obviously cuzz his angry looks scare ppl lyk haddin n hodge.
itz ok if he is not perfporming well but der is no substitute 4 him other than munaf patel but i think he has to b selected

2007-10-22 02:30:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anurag R 1 · 0 0

no shreesanth is not considered for australia tour...........bcoz his behaviour is bad....so
he will spoil indian country name.........

2007-10-25 13:48:02 · answer #10 · answered by hasnu 1 · 0 0

Yeah, definitely.

2007-10-22 08:34:00 · answer #11 · answered by Monk & his Ferrari 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers