yea those prolifers will try to make a woman who can not afford to keep her baby from aborting it, yet they give her very little help in supporting it. If they do help her out, it would be just to give her a few baby clothes or food, which really does not help much
2007-10-21 11:59:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by I<!771X/-\+26 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
ok now that's alot of advise and one sided answering there. 1st. in case you have seen an abortion esp. a partial delivery the place they kill a possible infant you will thoroughly understand why they sense disgusted via it. in case you have not: Please look it up. 2d. delivery administration become invented for a reason. inhabitants administration. Rape is null and void argument. If one become on the tablet one would not want an abortion. third. each adoptive parent i be attentive to is prolife. So I upload to the argument. What approximately synthetic insemination, Invitro fertilization, and fertility drugs. no one kills babies there, they lead them to. while they might have accompanied between the tens of millions of orphans world huge probable for much less money. merely by way of fact they sense DNA is a call for for romance. Why are they never scrutinized yet human beings combat the tooth and nail to be allowed to shove a steel tong instument in somewhat one's head or burn it with salt previously it has dermis?
2016-11-09 03:26:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
Pro-lifers do adopt many children.
The Real Question is: why do Adoption Agencies make it so hard to adopt a child.
Read all the fine print on requirements to adoption.
You will see that the Adoption Agencies do not want many children adopted.
Hmmmmm. I wonder why? Could money be involved?
Are Government Workers and Tax Money involved?
Do you think that baby killing abortionists value human life?
2007-10-21 12:08:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by wolf 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Where are these children? No matter, they are worth the love of God to save. So, yes I'll adopt an orphaned child, even if he/she has aids.
2007-10-21 12:02:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by tiger1943 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well, let me see. Not counting my own three, I'm now raising number seven -- an eleven year old. And I don't get any help from the government! Ask yourself this, where would you be right now had your mother chose to abort you? AND, what about all of the potential lost? Of the many options available, abortion is the wrong solution.
2007-10-21 12:02:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Doc 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Your numbers are exaggerated so your question has no merit. BTW, estimated by whom? Is it a biased group with an agenda?
However, life is a better option than murder. That's what "late term abortion" is! Abortion is now a form of birth control. I think that wrong.
What does this have to do with elections? The president or congress will not change anything regarding abortion. The Supreme Court will!
2007-10-21 12:02:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Sorry, but there aren't 100 million orphaned American children.
2007-10-21 11:53:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
good question, and yes, there probably are 100 million over the whole world if not waaaaay more. america's not the only country we should worry about. (to the answer above me) i would love to be a foster parent one day or adopt. again, good question.
2007-10-21 11:58:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Actually many do.... and many of the pro abortion don't... so what's your point?
2007-10-21 12:00:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋