Awesome Ron Paul Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG2PUZoukfA
2007-10-21 11:44:01 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
no way. the elite have already chosen the next prez. grow up.
2007-10-21 11:47:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Everything "Bush Is Not A Conservative" said is true except for the last sentance. The mainstream media in the U.S. is "trying to take the country in the direction of socialism....fox news included." LOL this is perhaps the most laughable statement I've ever heard and highlights the interesting point that a person can have dead on views on one topic and be dead wrong on others.
2007-10-23 14:20:12 · answer #2 · answered by kfinn360 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul is one of the favored Presidential candidates because of his excellent views on critical issues and he could challenge the popularity of Hillary Clinton and Rudolph Giuliani.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Ron Paul will likely win.
2007-10-21 19:45:34 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
If he was given more media or air time, he would be in danger of being committed.
It's a shame...he has some good points, but he's waaaay too extreme. We can all see how well extremists act in the middle east.
2007-10-23 22:15:46 · answer #4 · answered by DesignDiva1 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Negative, dear sir. I heartily disagree.
Ron Paul does not recieve the media's attention because he lacks.... charisma. Yes, that's the one. His liberal views disgust me, but not the point.
He can not speak well for himself or even defend his own views, we American's may have our issues, but we recognize truth...mostly. A mild mannered, lack of vocal authority man would not claim victory.
End Transmission.
2007-10-22 04:08:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
TOTALLY DISAGREE! MOST people that hear him think he's a kook. That's why his numbers are so low!
Why should the media be FORCED to report on a candidate with less than 2% of the vote? They pick their stories based on importance. A candidate that has no chance to win is meaningless.
I highly doubt media coverage would help. Paul gets plenty of coverage in the Internet and that hasn't increase his numbers.
It will be interesting to listen to him in the debate tonight. What rediculous statement will he make now? Will he have another meltdown and say that honor isn't important?
That video isn't awsome and neither is Ron Paul. All it says is that he's been in Congress for 10 terms and that's too long for any politition!
2007-10-21 19:11:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 7⤋
Yes he would be. He barely gets a mention by the MSM yet raised more than McCain and Huckabee and was right behind Thompson. Romney is basically funding his own campaign. The top tier candidates (R/D) are fake and will just continue more Bush policies.
2007-10-21 19:01:50 · answer #7 · answered by crucial_master 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
disagree. I think many of his policies and talking points are things that the average american voter agrees with. He is an advocate of extremely minimal government which means things like privatly funded schools, less business regulations and a whole slue of other things.
2007-10-21 18:48:12 · answer #8 · answered by Drake 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
We need more G rated political commericals that our kids see. Sort of like Mr Magoo in the land of oz. Disagree
2007-10-21 18:55:08 · answer #9 · answered by pacer 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
His chances would be better because he'd have more name recognition. I think the fact that he's truly conservative - i.e. less government intervention in our lives - and that his voting record supports what he says, would result in him being elected. The big key is the name recognition.
2007-10-21 19:01:42 · answer #10 · answered by Brian R 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋