This is Australian Politics but is does concern Global Warming, The current prime minister John Howard made the argument that we Australians can not sign Kyoto because he wants tougher Carbon targets placed on both China and India.He said he had recent discussions with both George Bush and the Chinese Premier and John said the Americans were on GW ,prepared for concessions which was interesting?Kevin Rudd destroyed this line of reasoning by stating that indeed if the US and Australia were not prepared to Ratify Kyoto, then they might in the future not meet tougher restrictions placed on them ,and India not wanting to be disadvantaged will also pull out and the whole thing will fall apart, the USA is the key to the whole thing as the whole world needs leadership on this important issue.
2007-10-21 10:47:30 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
So what do you think is the future of the Kyoto protocol if the USA does not ratify the treaty themselves?
2007-10-21 10:57:12 · update #1
I totally agreed with Kevin Rudd's answer. His arguments were strong and logical whereas John Howard missed the question with his arguments.
2007-10-21 12:47:19 · answer #1 · answered by Walter B 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
definite, it concerns plenty. There are financial issues besides as social ones, no longer purely are you in a relationship with the babies, yet in addition with the toddler's different parent. And somebody who already has babies won't want greater.
2016-10-13 11:01:49 · answer #2 · answered by gilboy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will probably die without the power of support.
2007-10-22 02:48:48 · answer #3 · answered by nickson faction 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-10-21 13:06:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
sorry i was on yahoo most of the night
2007-10-21 11:09:03 · answer #5 · answered by robin r 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Sorry -_-"
2007-10-21 19:40:21 · answer #6 · answered by Aqua 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋