Is it useless and completely propagandish? Can both liberals and conservatives agree that it is harmful to America?
2007-10-21 07:44:17 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I make that decision daily as I either change the channel, or just turn the tv off. I generally, at the most, watch less than 2 hours of tv a week, excluding movies and sports. Maybe thats one of the reasons why I still fail to see how bldg 7 fell without being hit by a plane.
2007-10-21 11:03:15 · answer #1 · answered by John S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The polarisation between people on the left and people on the right aka liberals and conservatives in the USA will always continue to utterly baffle me to be honest.
Saying "reject mainstream media" is surely out of hand? Anyone with even an ounce of intelligence in their heads can surely realise that ultimately every media source has its own agenda, some (a lot) more than others? Leave people to make up their own minds however that said, some people are easily led and completely incapable of independent thought.
2007-10-21 07:54:26 · answer #2 · answered by PRH1 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes it should be utterly rejected because these Mainstream "News" papers and "news" Stations are in fact propaganda outlets that are under the control of the Rothschild banking criminals. The Bankers with the most money are the ones who decide what people are told and their goal is perpetual war since that gives them the most profit. The globalist banking criminals also have a depopulation agenda so therefore constant warfare suits that agenda as well.
2014-03-09 19:54:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is time to reject the mainstream media. It is useless to anyone who wants just the facts. And it is very harmful to people who believe everything that they read or hear on the news.
2007-10-21 08:21:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Libs won't agree. They like it the way it is, since their brothers and sisters in the Joy to the World community run all the TV news stations except Fox. That really ticks them off.
Unless the military themselves, for example, concerning the war in Iraq have a complete network of their own, we wouldn't get news about it much of all. The only good thing however, about the media in general, though, is at least we get a gist. We must however pick through their weeds, and mud. Good luck on that one Libs!
2007-10-21 10:38:31 · answer #5 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
journalists are being detained, cellular telephones are being blocked, there are various stuff occurring to maintain the story in. I think of while extremely some the journalists flow away Iran in upcoming days or perhaps weeks we are able to pay attention so plenty greater effective than they're able to get out astonishing now. and each newscast i've got seen interior the final week in certainty has had memories approximately Iran on the incredible of the newscast and scenes of the protests. or maybe on community information that's been stated. i do no longer think of the politicians be attentive to what to assert, in the event that they say too plenty, the protesters may well be accused of being American spies or brokers, if we are saying to little they we are no longer helping, the two way they flow it ought to be undesirable. If something is being 'surpassed over' on the television information the final couple of days that's North Korea. i did no longer see one point out of it on NBC's information final night. i did no longer see CBS or ABC. That shows there are issues occurring in the back of the curtain however the Pentagon or White residing house isn't speaking.
2016-10-13 10:39:10 · answer #6 · answered by holtzer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evidently some have already started. I understand that the New York Times is getting close to stopping the presses! What a gift to the citizens!
2007-10-21 09:06:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This conservative agrees with you.
I think we should try them for Treason. I mean, if a private citizen did what some "reporters" have done, they'd be tried for treason. Why should a "reporter" be above that?
To me, there is no distinction between the paparazzi and any other "journalist". They're all scumbags.
2007-10-21 07:48:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think it's safe to say the media has forgotton why we have them. My answer is yes. Look at this link www.zeitgeistmovie.com Im not saying its fact or fiction.. just too look at it.
2007-10-21 07:56:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sadly, Yes. They are corrupt and one sided. Peace
2007-10-21 07:51:48 · answer #10 · answered by PARVFAN 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋