It's not a rule - it's an insurance policy that is instilled by most managers so that their pitcher(s) don't burn out by the end of the season.
Daisuke is a great example - coming from Japan, their season is shorter than ours; in order to keep him from going flat towards the end of the season they'll use that 100-pitch policy although it seems he has already hit that wall.
Do I think it should be enforced? That's up to the pitcher, manager, and pitching coach - everyone's mechanics are going to fall apart once they fatigue to a certain point and it's up to them to decide whether or not to continue with the same pitcher or bring in a new arm.
As an aside, knuckleballer Phil Niekro played until he was 48 and threw over 5400 innings during his career. Granted, he was a knuckleballer, and his arm and shoulder didn't get as taxed during the season... but I believe Niekro also threw a 16 or 17 inning complete game and said that performance had a permanent adverse effect on his pitching for the rest of his career.
2007-10-21 06:59:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not exactly a rule, but it is almost as oppressive as one. I hate it. It's bad enough that with the juiced up ball pitching stats are weak. Now with that one, Hall of Fame pitchers might be guys with 200 wins and an ERA under 5.00. Greg Maddox once had a shutout through 8 in the World Series and a reliever finished the game off. What were they saving his arm FOR? A World Series shutout is almost equal to a regular season no hitter. It make the game dull and long. If you win 7-2 you use only 4 pitchers instead of 5. Dull.
2007-10-21 06:53:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sarrafzedehkhoee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm talking minor league ball, AA Eastern league. Teams don't want to over work their pitchers, so the 100 pitch rule is common.
BUT, when a pitcher is pitching a low hit, low run game, it sucks. Imagine, a 1-1 game after 6. If I were a pitcher I'd want to win or lose the game myself, let me finish what I started.
Imagine, Curt Schilling is pitching a no hitter. you are the manager. Tell him he has to come out, he's thrown a hundred pitches.
you might be told to go have intercourse with yourself.
2007-10-21 09:33:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Barry auh2o 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's not a rule but rather a general point where most managers believe that there pitchers are tapped out and dont want to wear them down so they can't pitch next time in their rotation. Dice-K pitched a 254 pitch game in Japan before signing with the Sox. There are plenty of cases where pitches will go over 100 pitches, especially if they're pitching lights out.
Obviously someone who's style is based more on ball movement and making batters straight miss is more likely to pitch more than 100 pitches in a game than someone who relies on high 90s speed to simply blow by batters.
2007-10-21 06:34:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think the pitch count is a good idea. There are some crazy coaches out there who force their players to play through pain and exhaustion. With a limit on the pitch count, it can prevent these coaches from taking advantage of the players. Side Note: I believe the author of the question was referring to Little League, as they have recently issued rules regarding pitch count. The MLB does not enforce a pitch count.
2007-10-21 06:33:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by yanksgirl313 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it doesn't suck, it probably does when a pitcher is doing good, but remember, a starting pitcher gets an average of 33 starts a season and average 100 pitches a game (unless they're getting beat) and they also throw a lot of warm up pitches in the bullpen and between innings, so when you really think about it, it doesn't suck because your pitchers arm can stay healthy and fresh throughout the whole season.
2007-10-21 06:32:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by nitr0 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didn't know there was a 100 pitch rule. I thought it was that they could go untill they tired out and then the manager and pitching coach made the decision. It doesn't really matter anyway since most pitchers are tired out by then.
2007-10-21 06:31:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by St. Louis Cardinals Fan 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no 100 pitch rule. A pitcher can go untill he is tired.
2007-10-21 06:49:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rocketman 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
i do no longer purely like the belief of warning the pitchers in any respect. this promises a great earnings to hitters. as quickly through fact the communities are warned, a glass would be unable to pitch interior for concern of having thrown out for throwing on the batter. they might besides positioned the ball on a tee for the batter. If MLB needs to make the "penalty" harder for hitting a batter, they can supply effectual batter 2 bases quite of one or how approximately an escalating scale with the 1st hit batter by potential of a collection interior the pastime getting a million base, the 2d gets 2 bases, 0.33 one 3 bases, and four or greater get 4 bases. that should end multiple retaliations in a pastime.
2016-10-13 10:27:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's LAME!! Years ago,pitchers like Sandy Foufax,Whitey Ford,Bob Gibson,Mickey Lolich,Bob Feller etc.would pitch nine innings no problem.The money factor and stretching out their arms for a long career has made the difference in this 162 game season. Too many over priced prima donnas that are full of themselves in MLB today.
2007-10-21 07:09:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Johnny Z. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋