English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

No. Actually it would no longer be needed.

2007-10-21 06:05:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

confident. that's been predicted that if all ice in earth would soften the sea point would upward push approximately 80 meters. besides the incontrovertible fact that that's a maximum unlikely concern. in spite of the fact that if the worst circumstances of the ipcc-predictions comes actual sea tiers would merely upward push approximately 20 inches in approximately 50 years. Oil reserves would be depleted long previously the icecaps would soften thoroughly. The scare methods action picture "The inconvenient actuality" confirmed how a great number of Florida would drown if the sea tiers would upward push 20 ft. yet that's greater beneficial than 10 circumstances as much as ipcc predictions. additionally it confirmed how the Larsen A and B ice cabinets of Antarctic had melted in a quick volume of time. yet how plenty did the sea point upward push by way of fact of that? honestly not something. by way of fact those ice sheets have been floating in water as adversarial to located on land. by way of fact they have been floating archimedes concept demands that sea tiers can not upward push while the ice melts. merely ice on land would reason sea point variations as they soften.

2016-11-09 02:41:23 · answer #2 · answered by fones 4 · 0 0

Actually we don't need the Panama Canal even now. It's an obsolete resource given how wars are fought and commerce is done now.

2007-10-21 06:07:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

200 feet. I love fish, and that would be one way to make more room for 'em. Imagine all the poor people that could be fed.

2007-10-21 06:15:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Actually it would be kinda nice if we didn't need the canal anymore. It would solve more problems than one.
I Cr 13;8a

2007-10-21 09:58:18 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

Wow. One of the myriad of benefits to Global Warming. We'll be able to transport goods faster and cheaper!!!

2007-10-21 06:09:16 · answer #6 · answered by Duminos 2 · 1 0

Who are you Al Gore? Get real. Global warming is a political trick to make people vote Democratic and to scramble their brains.

2007-10-21 06:05:04 · answer #7 · answered by Bill D 2 · 2 1

No. Because if we don't act and allow global warming to get that bad, our entire civilization will have collapsed.

2007-10-21 06:15:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

200 feet not enough to get Rush DoDo's house, fun question.

2007-10-21 06:12:22 · answer #9 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 0 1

Not my problem... but by the next millennium they will be able to deal with it.

2007-10-21 06:25:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers