Maybe they should, but since he has a 10 year contract it would cost a lot of money.
2007-10-21 05:41:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frank R 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
nicely, if Notre Dame would not desire to be held as hypocritical, they could desire to be firing Weis. many times you provide a coach til his 0.33 season to pick no count if to hearth him or no longer through fact a million/2 the roster ought to be his gamers and the gamers ought to be be attentive to-how his device. And together with his gamers Weis isnt doing something. He became doing greater useful with the Willingham recruits. And opposite to a distinctive answer, Weis became no longer Notre Dames first %., city Meyer became..yet he became them down. If Weis is such an offensive genius, then why would be unable to he get something going? the previous couple of years Notre Dame has had extremely some the incredible recruiting training. Dont provide me the...he lost his incredible quarterback, working decrease back from final 300 and sixty 5 days subject the two. Michigan started Henne and Hart 3 years in the past and went to the Rose Bowl. He has been heavily out coached this season. Did that one guy call Michigan State an offensive powerhouse? The group that submit 3 offensive factors against OSU and 17 against a undesirable Pitt group? besides, if Notre Dame have been to be consistent of their practices they may well be firing Weis at season's end. yet considering the fact that while is Notre Dame consistent now?
2016-10-13 10:21:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Think about it. What's Charlie going to do, promise to improve? He could promise to improve for 5 years and still not go to a bowl game.
Notre Dame is going to fire three-chins charlie some day, the sooner the better. The only reason he was a good offensive coordinator is because Tom Brady was quarterback.
2007-10-23 08:06:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes he's good season's came after the other coaches recruiting Charlie Weis strikes me as a person who wouldn't go 1000 miles and sit down with a player and his family to get them to ND, he might be a good coach but if he don't work to get his players he will lose a lot of games.
2007-10-21 06:01:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by jktramel 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I feel it's only right that Wiess get the same chance Daives and Willingham received. ND gave the previous coaches, three years to prove themselves before firing them. This is Chuck's third year and the next big game ND wins will be it's first.
2007-10-21 06:08:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dopemane 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depends totally on next season, everyone is on the Willingham bandwagon all of a sudden but lets face it, ND could be winless this year if Willingham was still here. Weis may actually have his act together next year, but if he doesnt win another game this year, I would have him looking for a job in NAIA.
2007-10-21 05:45:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by sawxwoodsy1980 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Charlie Weis should be demoted to toilet cleaner. Thats where his game plan belongs.
Too bad that they can't afford to fire him.
But it is so much fun to watch them loooosssee.
2007-10-21 06:14:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by rssvss 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. He lost all of his best players. He just needs a really good recruiting year this next season.
2007-10-21 05:41:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by angel_medic05 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
no, I love to see Notre Dame lose
2007-10-21 05:43:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Shaq Diesel 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Midway through next year, I will let you know. Didn't ND learn about firing a good coach after one bad year?
2007-10-21 05:41:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by blibityblabity 7
·
0⤊
1⤋