warren farrell was quoted as saying in a 1977 penthouse interview that genitally caressing children should be permissible - that people overreact to it.
i think the guy is a nut job.
are people adept at reading body language? seems to me, we have to at least read a book on it or something. this guy just wants to give the power back to men - power to read body language and act on it alone.
2007-10-21 04:58:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
5⤋
Sorry genital caressing is pedophilia and rationalizing this behaviour is analogous to sufferer blaming and attempting to pursuade something of society that that's not risky to infants. the guy who wrote a woman well being care provider stated that's for sure attempting to blow smoke up our *****. If this become actual i'd want to make certain the link so i'd desire to call her what she is a nicely. Warren Farrell is obviously a very ill guy or woman and the female who introduced this too the standard public's interest inspired him to undertaking her in courtroom. Farrell subsidized off immediately together with his tail between his legs as everyone in his place would desire to do. There are a the thank you to a lot of human beings taking income of susceptible populations including infants and ladies (those disabled, from minorities and newly immigrated are the main liable to sexual violence. (documents Canada, 2003).
2016-11-09 02:33:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by lizarraga 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
So what if the body language conveys a "yes" that is subjective, it can be misinterpreted. One can think someone is saying "yes" with their body, but can be saying "no" actually.
The word "NO" is not subjective. It's definition/meaning is clear. There should be no debate as to what someone means when they say this. Despite any other non-verbal signs one is getting. If the word "NO" is spoken then that is the ultimate signal as to what a person wants.
2007-10-21 07:48:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
I think the quote has a certain amount of merit...althought I think it gets taken a bit far by providing the labels of date fraud and date lying. We can do without the new language and lables, thank you very much.
But I do believe that women need to be more responsible with their use of the word 'no'...as it has become a very politically charged one. When "No Means No" became such a common phrase in our language, women should have recognized the importance of the word and started using it responsibly. There are just too many cases out there (even one is too many) of false accusations and situations where women and men are on opposite sides of a legal battle, when they started out at opposite sides of a dining table having a date...
2007-10-21 06:26:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Super Ruper 6
·
5⤊
3⤋
The issue goes to consent, and under settled law, consent can be manifested in a variety of ways. Usually, "no" means exactly that, but it is conceivable in a given instance and depending on the circumstances, that it is obvious a verbal "no" said in a playful way while she pulls you closer, actually means "yes." In any event, men are better off not pulling out, despite how obvious it is she means "yes," because it's not worth a claim of "date rape" from some loony person.
2007-10-21 05:33:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
If you intend to help your son or daughter learn to learn successfully, perhaps not with TV and videos, pc applications and programs, as well as the school program is the clear answer, the program, Children Learning Reading, from here https://tr.im/Q89nV is.
For a child to effectively understand and master studying skills they need regular interest in one or both parents. With this in your mind, nevertheless, the instructions are held small from 5 to a quarter-hour a day.
With Children Learning Reading system you will even build and boost your connection with your son or daughter not just how to see effectively.
2016-04-29 01:23:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey,
There are numerous documented benefits and advantages of teaching children to read early on, and teaching them to reading using phonics and phonemic awareness instructions. It is clear that early language and reading ability development passes great benefits to the child as they progress through school at all grades, and that early language and reading problems can lead to learning problems later on in school.
For a simple, step-by-step program that can help your child learn to read visit this web site: http://readingprogram.toptips.org
Best
2014-09-17 23:01:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Warren's an idiot. No means NO. PERIOD. If a woman verbally communicates that, then the man must stop, regardless of her "body language." If he doesn't, then that IS rape. No exceptions.
Warren's claim that a woman is committing "date fraud" with her body language but not with her verbal language is pathetic.
2007-10-21 08:17:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by ArAmG 4
·
10⤊
3⤋
1
2017-03-01 00:47:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chris 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
he is making the worst argument i have ever heard. continuing to have sex with someone when they have said no, is in no way analogous to someone being a "tease."
generally i find that when men call women a tease, it is because of two things,
1) they cannot read or interpret body language. a revealing outfit does not mean "come do me."
2) they are whining because they can't get laid.
either way, grow up and get over it.
2007-10-21 09:54:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
This is ridiculous. Any guy who listens to a woman's body language more than her verbal language is out of his mind.
2007-10-21 05:11:41
·
answer #11
·
answered by Rio Madeira 7
·
6⤊
2⤋