I would think if Police are necessary then he shouldn't be back at work.
What do you think?
2007-10-21 02:52:44 · 27 answers · asked by !Lady Stormy! 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/22664/Guard-as-Gerry-returns-to-work
2007-10-21 02:53:01 · update #1
I thought they had all the publics support. At least that's what they keep saying, so why the protection? Everyone supports them and their decision to leave the children alone so they could have 2 bottles of wine, oops no I mean 8 bottles er 14.. well some wine, but the public obviously support this choice because apparently it's ok to leave kids unsupervised as long as you lock the doors oops I mean leave them open so the kids can be checked every 5 mins, no sorry 20 mins, half hour oops every hour. I could go on but I really can't be bothered to write down ALL the contradictions in their stories. The fact they say the public is 100% behind is just another little discrepancy to add to the huge list of McCann comments that I am sure will be changed again soon.
Sorry had such a rant there I forgot to answer your question...
No if protection is necessary they should pay for private protection themselves or not go back to work.
2007-10-21 03:50:37 · answer #1 · answered by Charley 4 · 9⤊ 3⤋
No...I don't think it's a waste of tax payers money at all..... there are sick people in this country that have judged him guilty of a crime before there is any evidence against him, and god only knows what these people are capable of....i shudder to think because some people are all consumed in their witch hunt.
What IS a waste of tax payers money is the lazy benefit scroungers who live off my blood sweat and tears so they can have a free ride in this life!
2007-10-21 06:47:16 · answer #2 · answered by nusha 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is just beyond parody now. He is not a celebrity, or in any way threatened, at least not anymore than other members of the public who stand up to yobs and gangs and are offered NO protections whatsoever by the police, let alone a personal bodyguard.
2007-10-21 03:42:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
If he is going back to work he will be earning money again so...if he's earning money, why should we have to pay for police to protect him. Surely he can pay for his own protection if he feels he needs it. If he can't, well he's got the original fund for his living expenses (yes I know its a total misuse of those funds, but hasn't it been all along) and his great friend Branson and goodness knows what other rich and famous people are funding them.
2007-10-21 04:01:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
If you or I 'phone the police and tell them we think we may be in danger of being assaulted or murdered the police will tell us they cannot do anything until there is an incident.
Gerry McCann is a proven liar and child neglector with allegations of drugging his children in order to allow him and his wife to go out for hours drinking FACT.
The man should be SUSPENDED from writing any kind of prescribed drugs and should not be allowed alone with any children until he is either charged or the case dropped.
HOW DARE THIS GOVERNMENT GIVE HIM PROTECTION,
Why not let Charles Bronson out of prison and give him protection at least he is honest.
2007-10-21 03:57:55 · answer #5 · answered by st.abbs 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
So would you rather he lived off the Fund?
Why would he need protection? From those on a witch hunt, maybe?
2007-10-21 05:47:44 · answer #6 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
This is probably another case of where do we deploy so many as long as its out of the real problem areas
2007-10-21 03:57:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
i thought the law would prevent him from returning back to work whilst hes a suspect,surely this is jumping ahead
2007-10-21 09:34:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gerry MaCcann & PM Gorden Brown are friends that how Gerry got proctection...
2007-10-21 04:04:09 · answer #9 · answered by Smiley Heart 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
The Express? Are you sure this story is accurate?
2007-10-21 10:04:23 · answer #10 · answered by James Mack 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋