http://www.peta.org/feat/stellavid/index.html
2007-10-21 00:44:23 · 15 answers · asked by HAPPY HEART 3 in Beauty & Style ➔ Other - Beauty & Style
@TomT :
Hi Tom, Perhaps Peta has "terroist" tactics, perhaps not. Greenpeace is a "terroist" organization for some too. Regardless of your feelings for such organizations, one can still however answer the question. I hope that your answer is not influenced solely by your feelings for Peta...?
Here is an organization who never caused any harm to anyone : http://www.fondationbrigittebardot.fr/
Regards to you,
Katya
2007-10-21 01:46:43 · update #1
@RKO : Hi there ! Wow we work in the same business you and I ;-)
2007-10-21 01:48:59 · update #2
I've been in advertising, marketing, publishing, and sales all of my life. I've been fortunate to have traveled to many places in Europe, including London, Paris, Zurich, and Innsbruck. I've met many people throughout my travels and almost everyone I've ever had the privilege of knowing would, I believe, agree with me:
We'd ALL rather be NAKED than wear fur!!!
-RKO- 10/21/07
2007-10-21 01:45:19 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yeah im shy but i would get butt naked to save a fox or any animal for that matter i suppose.Why not? they, the models on the catwalks should wear fake Hides because nobody can tell anyway! they should only use the fur and hide from animals which die of natural causes.
2007-10-21 11:02:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I had a legitimate need to wear fur, warmth, etc, I would wear fur without regard to the domestic terrorist organization known as PETA.
2007-10-21 01:22:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Naked.....just thinki of all the animals being killed....imagine if you were to be killed and made into a human skin coat.....I bet you wouldnt think twice before saying no.....but the animals dont have that right!!!!
CONGRATZ TO SOUTH AFRICA FOR WINNING THE RUGBY WORLD CUP.......LOVE U ALL.....
FROM A PROUD SOUTH AFRICAN!!!!!
2007-10-21 01:43:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't wear furs, but if given the choice, i probrably would, unless the animal died of natural causes.
2007-10-21 06:31:21 · answer #5 · answered by Timothy C 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be naked than wear ANYTHING! Bare skin is in, and it looks and feels awesome (in most cases).
2007-10-23 05:26:09 · answer #6 · answered by nudie chick 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, unless i was naked in the artic and needed something for warmth.
2007-10-21 01:33:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would be naked than wear animal skins & furs! why does almost everybody wear the innocent animals' skins & furs???
T-T::protect animals!!
2007-10-21 02:08:02 · answer #8 · answered by tyra sam. 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes! I also don't want to wear make-up because it is tested on animals.
2007-10-21 01:26:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I suppose id rather be naked, but i wouldnt really like that either.
2007-10-21 01:06:00 · answer #10 · answered by sophie b 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋