Why?
and dont give me that "they both have their own good parts" bullshit. choose your side or be forever remembered as an ambivalent fool. i await your response
2007-10-20 19:20:45 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
"and dont give me that "they both have their own good parts""
Okay... I wouldn't anyway necessarily.
I choose unmentioned option 4...
Neither.
I'm married, and I believe in genderless nature of the soul, neither is conducive towards choosing a side.
Ambivalent: to know the options and not care.
God bless.
2007-10-20 20:03:41 · answer #1 · answered by Gravitar or not... 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silly rabbit. It's not foolish to remain ambivalent in the face of the unknowable.
BUT if you're a man with the smoothness and comedic timing of my friend "Small" up there, then-- nope, nevermind. It's still better to be a woman. ;-)
2007-10-21 03:21:27 · answer #2 · answered by Ms Informed 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Not to be biased,but being a man is better. It is easier to live as such beacuse we can walk around without a shirt and no one would give a hoot(unless you're out of shape,in which case you must wear a bra fat ***! We are better cooks. Men have a shorter longevity,which is good,since life sucks! And,of course,easier to go to the toilet.
2007-10-21 02:31:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a wrong question you asked. The question ought to be what you are doing there (whichever form you are in). Because the person who complains about his condition will never get happy in this life until he commit himself to be a 'man of character' who takes himself the responsibility of his condition and goes on improving till the end of his life.
2007-10-21 10:54:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Film, my fair lady, suggests man. Walking through the shops and stopping to talk to someone suggests woman. Film,Pygmaileon, also suggests man. Elizabeth i pointed out masculine qualities in her main speech. Guys develop later and therefore have better abilities. I still think women are better.
2007-10-21 03:26:30 · answer #5 · answered by Think Tank 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i believe it is much better to be a man b/c we have no where near the amount of physical consequence of being a woman. i shudder at the thought of child birth. also the world is still a male dominated planet and honestly i think a man will get more respect than a woman. also its a lot easier for a guy to do stuff without being judged leaving him free to move about the social heirarchy as he wishes. unfortunately men usually have the burden of responsibility authority and work as well. Tis better to live a day as a man than to live a lifetime as a queen
2007-10-21 02:27:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think men have it easier in this world which we have created for ourselves. We are at a stage of evolution where 'might is right'. When we reach the spiritual & mental stage of evolution then it would be better to be born a woman :)
2007-10-21 03:51:06 · answer #7 · answered by Praxis 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a woman.
through that you get the chance to choose whether to cherish or to stop someone elses life from starting...
the thing is, you don't have to choose but just accept or be the most of what you turn out to be....
2007-10-21 02:29:38 · answer #8 · answered by ace m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Having never been a man I don't actually know, but I guess a man. You can pee standing up and you don't have to worry about periods or pregnancy. Although, women do live longer...
2007-10-21 02:26:08 · answer #9 · answered by Jodie 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Be a true human being able to embrace and appreciate all aspects of life fully aware of their importance. That’s the greatest of all challenges.
2007-10-21 04:58:04 · answer #10 · answered by MARY B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋