English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-20 14:05:04 · 21 answers · asked by the d 6 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

Cell division = life.

I'm pro-baby and abortion disgusts me.

2007-10-20 14:11:54 · answer #1 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 4 3

I think I would be considered "Pro-choice", though I don't think much of those women who use it as birth control - there are preventative measures in this world that can be taken to avoid getting pregnant. Use them.

I happen to be adopted, so I think that, if possible, the better choice would be adoption, but I also understand that there are times in which a woman feels they cannot go through a pregnancy - say, if the woman got pregnant as the result of a rape. Is it fair to make her carry a child for that long? Yes, I realize it is not the childs fault, and that the child should not have to pay those consequences...

It is a difficult issue, and it is difficult for anyone to say what is right or wrong until you are in that position, or to even say what choice you would make until you are in that position.

2007-10-20 21:13:25 · answer #2 · answered by IJToomer 5 · 4 1

If a woman has a baby she doesn't want then more likely
that baby going to grow up being abused or not raised
right. If people doesn't believe in abortion, then why aren't
they running to adopt a baby and take care of it?

2007-10-20 21:12:14 · answer #3 · answered by Jbuckeye 5 · 3 2

I am for a woman's right to choose. If you want to preach about unprotected sex, you may as well outlaw alcohol too. Because many women have gotten pregnant after too much partying. A Christian's belief on the matter is of no substance, it is a "belief". Women will have them if they are illegal or not. I would rather keep them safe and legal.

2007-10-20 21:36:01 · answer #4 · answered by Gaia 3 · 1 2

My stance ? - Narrow lol.

Narrow on abortion / anti-abortion .
Narrow in Minneapolis Airport Bathrooms too !

2007-10-20 21:08:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I believe only in post-natal abortion.

When someone performs an abortion or has one performed on them, you should be able to abort the abortionist, immediately.

In that way, it's not murder (just like abortion isn't murder), they were just aborted.

Too easy.

2007-10-20 21:21:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I believe it is murder.Nothing to do with religion.It is alive,it moves and breathes it is alive and killing it for a convenience is murder.There are so many ways you can use as birth control that abortion should not be needed as birth control.

2007-10-20 21:18:37 · answer #7 · answered by flossie mae 5 · 0 2

outlawing it is a very cost effective way for rich folk to keep the minorities down . if they were really worried about the unwanted babies there wouldn't be over 900,000 kids waiting for adoption right here in the USA. let them put their money where their mouth is ,or else shut up and keep it legal .ask one of those 'its murder' phonies how many inner city, minority ,crack babies THEY have adopted .

2007-10-20 21:15:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I am against abortion on demand, but I believe it should be an option for medical situations, rape, and incest.

2007-10-20 21:10:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I support a woman's right to chose. I believe religious beliefs should never play a factor with abortion. By law, abortion is legal and a woman should be able to receive an abortion under any circumstances.

2007-10-20 21:08:46 · answer #10 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 6 6

fedest.com, questions and answers