Yes, to being married, but more importantly, being married to him since her only claim to fame is his name.
2007-10-20 13:28:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
She had that in mind when it became public knowledge Bill had numerous affairs prior to his running for the Presidency in 1992.
She defended him on national TV back then for the SAME offenses...even when he was later accused of rape. That charge was buried VERY quickly.
She has wanted this opportunity since BEFORE Bill ever entered the race for President.
2007-10-20 20:31:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Philip H 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe just that. She forgave every indiscretion because she needed Bill to get where she is now. Why else would a woman put up with a cheating dog like Bill Clinton?
2007-10-20 20:33:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Aunt Doobie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Before Hillary went to the senate, the only “credentials” she had to be president was being a president’s wife… so yes.
2007-10-20 20:28:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by 5c0tt 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
she's actually been using him all along very political gain. Call it a Faustian bargain between the 2. I feel sorry for Chelsea to have to be born to a sorry set of parents.
2007-10-20 20:28:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. She would have been better off in the eyes of the public if she had divorced him. She would have been seen as a strong, independent, intelligent woman who doesn't take crap from anyone, including her husband.
It would have left her open to marry someone else the public would have approved of...maybe like Obama.
2007-10-20 20:29:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Of course & what a great revenge! He'd certainly make a fine first lady.
2007-10-20 20:30:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i doubt any woman would do that.
i think she stayed with him because she promised to stay with him through anything. thats the purpose of the vows. not everyone breaks promises even though adultery is probably the best reason to leave someone.
2007-10-20 20:30:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by the grand super C 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
BILL CLINTON WHEN HE WAS GOVERNOR ASKED HILLARY FOR A DIVORCE, BECAUSE BILL WAS IN LOVE WITH SOMEONE ELSE......HILLARY GOT MAD AND REFUSED THE DIVORCE, SHE TOLD BILL..." SOMEDAY I WANT YOU TO BE PRESIDENT AND I'M GOING TO BE WITH YOU, END OF STORY."
2007-10-20 20:31:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I would bet money on it. I'm sure any love died out decades before. The relationship is business-beneficial.
2007-10-20 20:28:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋