not much
2007-10-20 12:58:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's no way I would give up chocolate for a month.
2007-10-20 19:59:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eugene 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If I thought they'd really give it to me, I'd keep the price fairly low. $500. For just $500, I would give up all forms of chocolate, any food that has chocolate as an ingredient, for one month.
2007-10-20 19:59:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by dumbuglyweirdo 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Theres not enough money in the world to make me give up chocolate
2007-10-20 19:58:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by jrsygrl 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't give up chocolate for money, unless that money brought me happiness. Chocolate comforts me.
2007-10-20 20:06:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Countess Blavinskeya 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't indulge in chocolate very often and when I do it is in small amounts (say a chocolate bar). Thirty bucks ought to cover it.
2007-10-20 20:04:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually, none, because I don't eat it anyway. But I would tell them that I'm a chocolate addict so they would pay me anyway. Somewhere in the region of the price of a couple of nice outfits.
2007-10-20 20:02:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fröken Fräken 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd do it for $20 bucks. I'm not a chocolate person.
2007-10-20 19:59:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by grouch2111 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I would take 500 without a second thought! but then I could really use the money and not the calories :)
2007-10-20 20:00:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Fire's Shaddow 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
That's an oxymoron for sure. Probably $100.
2007-10-20 20:01:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by WooleyBooley again 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hmm...
Fifty bucks.
I don't much care for chcolate.
Oh, But godiva...
You would have to give buy me an aircraft of some sort.
2007-10-20 20:00:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by pantalon_noir 3
·
1⤊
0⤋