Can Hillary be completly without knowledge as to the criminal offenses that occurred in her Husbands administration, if so would she be clueless to corruption in her own administration if elected?
2007-10-20 12:00:42 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sure, libs couldn't care less about the criminality of their leaders.
2007-10-20 12:04:59 · answer #1 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 4⤊ 8⤋
The key words in your question? "accused of"
Clearly, she's a viable candidate. She just keeps gaining support with every week that goes by, kind of hard to miss.
What criminal offenses? Here's the thing. All the crap the Republicans accused the Clintons of was never proven. Not one indictment - now how does that turn into criminal offenses? By magic? The only people who aren't tired of hearing about all the things the Republicans accused the Clintons of and couldn't prove are the Republicans who act as though they actually proved something.
2007-10-20 19:37:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Mr/Ms Neocon, why are you hiding behind this avatar, I'm sure it does not reflect your real identity whatsoever. Everyone knows that you are spreading your usual lies and propaganda in order to mislead American People. Why don't we talk about blood thirsty George W. Bush for a change who along with his cronies almost destroyed our country. Or perhaps your today's assignment to smear an demonize Clintons so that American People attention will be diverted from your leaders George and Dick?
2007-10-20 19:22:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Lunatic Right-wing Crackpot Party wasted 6 years and $70 million of our tax dollars "investigating" their phony accusations against the Clintons during the 90s.
They came up empty handed. All they found out was that Bill likes BJs.
So much for you and your baseless claims.
2007-10-20 19:05:23 · answer #4 · answered by obl_alive_and_well 4 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Not to me....however this is the same country that voted for Bush, so anything can happen.
I remember when I thought back in 2000 "How can the GOP be so retarded to choose Bush over McCain?" --- this time if the DNC chooses Clinton over Obama, I will completely lose all faith in this electorate of vapid baby boomers
2007-10-20 19:03:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
With all the years and years of investigations - noting was found except a personal matter of marital infidelity.
The Clintons have been vetted honest.
Tough luck to the chumps who tried to find a crime.
2007-10-20 19:10:07 · answer #6 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋
I won't support her by any means, but I do think she will capture the hearts of a lot loyal Clinton Democrats to win the Primary.
2007-10-20 19:04:24 · answer #7 · answered by RICARDVS VII 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Accused is key word . Not convicted . This is America . We should not convict on here say . The court found not enough to convict . So the charges are moot .
2007-10-20 19:06:25 · answer #8 · answered by J D 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
If you are going to disqualify any politicianwho is corrupt, you wont have anyone left to vote for.
2007-10-20 19:05:16 · answer #9 · answered by Andrew 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Only if she can pander to enough special interest groups. Promising free health care, or a $5,000 savings for a baby, etc. Once she is elected, then we will all suffer the wrath of Socialist Hillary with skyrocketing taxes. And if you think only the rich....think again. If you get a paycheck, she will be raising your taxes.
2007-10-20 19:05:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 7⤋
Of course she can! Just look at all the blind sheeple on this website that give her kudos for absolutely nothing!
2007-10-20 19:35:24 · answer #11 · answered by DOIN' RIGHT AINT GOT NO END 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋