English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.uuforum.org/deficit.htm Here are the facts ! Read before you reply !

2007-10-20 11:45:13 · 7 answers · asked by J D 4 in Politics & Government Politics

It takes 5 years fo econimists to agree then post . The people feal it quickly . Like the current economy the say is fine . it will take 5 years for them to admit the problem..

2007-10-20 12:27:23 · update #1

7 answers

Democrats - spend less while still keeping government services functioning.
Makes me wonder how much the cronies of the Republicans are skimming that they both cut services budgets AND STILL SPEND MORE.

2007-10-20 12:04:49 · answer #1 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 1 2

Many Republican have offered into the thought tax cuts pay for themselves and so think of a mode to stability the fee variety is to decrease taxes and Democrats are unwilling to decrease spending and the two events cater to pastime communities. there is purely a minority in the two celebration that rather care approximately financial accountability. besides the shown fact that they mirror the view of electorate who so some distance have not shown themselves to care the two. Even the individuals on the tea events have been hostile to medicare cuts that the democrats supported as area of the heath care bill.

2016-11-09 01:25:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It would not be the Republican who would take higher taxes and spread them around on all these socialistic programs that Hillary is expounding.
Clinton was riding high on the dot com bubble and lucky for him it burst just before he left office, leaving the nation heading for the recession President Bush inherited. Clinton did not have the expense of 9/11, Katrina or Iraq. Iraq. BTW was a bipartisan effort.

2007-10-20 12:08:19 · answer #3 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 0 2

It takes at least five years for economic policy to take effect. Ask any economist and you will get the same answer! Clinton's numbers were actually the residual of Bush #1. President Bush the second has been battling 8 years of Clinton waste and throw in hurricane Katrina...well you figure it out!

2007-10-20 12:12:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Neither. They both waste tax money equally, they just spend it on different things.

2007-10-20 11:48:17 · answer #5 · answered by numbnuts 3 · 2 1

C. none of the above

2007-10-20 11:54:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

hahauhaha!they are both whores!

2007-10-20 12:48:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers