When you really think about it, what can they say except to call the President names? He will go down in history as a good president and a good man.
He has done a lot to keep this country safe. You are only able to do so much with a Democrat congress, who also wants to say, "See we told you so!"
Under this president more people own homes. I am not talking about the ones who made bad decisions. At this time he is trying to get those homes re-mortgaged easier for them to have affordable payments.
Despite Katrina, Iraq and 9/11 we are not doing so bad. Unemployment is at an all time low across the nation due to the tax cuts, yet the Libs refuse to give the president credit for that.
He also signed the workplace verification bill to prevent hiring of illegal aliens.
He submitted the comprehensive energy plan. In the process of eliminating the marriage penalty.
And he changed the tone of the White house, restoring HONOR and DIGNITY to the presidency!
2007-10-20 11:28:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Moody Red 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Your stats are way off. additionally you're employing the %. and decide determination via any baby-kisser in potential. You forget approximately many stats that for tell of undesirable financial equipment. How come the dollar is on the all-time low against many foreign places money? Why is the commerce deficit at a all time low? Why is the middle type shrinking and the detrimental type turning out to be? Why are human beings on the backside factor each at saving for the destiny. What with regard to the checklist extreme quantities of credit to the common American? i will flow on longer yet you get the factor. a real conservative could comprehend which you're no longer telling the authentic stats of the financial equipment.
2016-12-18 12:53:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are lemmings blindly following the leftist talking points. Their hatred of Bush is irrational and stems from blind ideology. They prize themselves on being free thinkers yet they seldom think. Anyone that hateful is scary. Oh and they seem to get opinions and facts mixed up a lot. You see, opinions do not equal facts but they seem to substitute them all the time.
2007-10-20 11:19:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Well, the same things goes for Republicans. Personally when I ask a question about GWB or any Republican politician I get replies about former president Bill Clinton, which is usually totally irreverent towards the question I asked. But this is America, the constitution protects our right to free speech. So that means we have every right to protest against GWB. It makes it fun when people like you get upset when we criticize GWB.
2007-10-20 11:13:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Liberal City 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
That's because you are trying to assign a single belief to a bunch of people who -- as part of their core platform -- value individualism and difference of opinion.
Of course you are going to get many different answers and opinions -- that's the nature of being a liberal -- that all of that diversity and difference of belief is validated.
And of course the few things they are all going to agree on are being in opposition to anyone taking away those freedoms -- that's again common sense if you actually understand the liberal mindset. They are not united in a common goal except to ensure that each individual is free to pursue their individual goals.
That's the basic difference between liberals and conservatives -- conservatives often have an organized common agenda -- because that philosophy values conformity and group efforts -- so of course they are going to be more consistent than people who value diversity and individuality.
2007-10-20 11:14:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
All 6 of them.
2007-10-20 15:42:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
As opposed to the conservatives who answer any question about the shortcomings of the Bush Administration with old crap about the Clintons? Pot meet kettle.
2007-10-20 11:19:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
I have also noticed that the conservatives on this board have no consensus other than their hatred for anything liberal.
2007-10-20 11:23:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
If you catergorize people with simple meaningless phrases like "libs" and "cons" your argument is automatically null and void.
Critisizing Bush is very easy, since he has made so many mistakes.
2007-10-20 11:17:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Andrew 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
Of course theere's no "consensus." Real Americans don't enslave themselves to some leader's agenda. We think for ourselves.
That's why the cons lost last November--and will lose in 2008. Why they always lose in the long run.
2007-10-20 11:12:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋