Do you think it's fair that when a white person and a person of another race (I'll say Japanese for an example) have a child, that the child would be considered Japanese (or Asian) rather than white or even half? Also what about with the Pocahontas Exception which says if someone's three quarters white, they're considered white? That doesn't sound right if a half-Japanese guy (who'd legally be considered Japanese and not white) had a child with a white girl and the child would be considered white. Why is it that half-white people aren't considered white? Do you think that's fair to the white parent and the child?
2007-10-20
07:23:10
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I'm talking about in a cultural sense. It's not fair that one parent gets recognized and the other doesn't.
2007-10-20
07:30:23 ·
update #1
The white genes are always recessive. I've seen half black children who have blonde hair and green eyes and resemble the white parent's skin tone more than the black one's.
2007-10-20
07:54:15 ·
update #2
Actually in the Japanese culture, they're very accepting of half-Japanese and I've never seen a Caucasian person reject half-Japanese people either. Not in America or Japan at least. I don't know how they act in other cultures.
2007-10-20
08:15:09 ·
update #3
I'm Cherokee on my mom's side but my father's white and even though my mother is very dark skinned, dark eyes and dark hair, I was born platinum blonde and blue eyed. My mom also has African-American in her. Despite that, I look nothing like her. So the white gene can be dominant. It was very dominant in my case. Most people laugh when I say I'm part Cherokee and think it's a joke.
2007-10-22
00:21:04 ·
update #4