I see conplaints here about the credibility of peoples sources, then those that complain use the same sources they complain about. Is a source credible only if you believe what they are telling you? Some examples are saying the media is liberal biased,then conservatives use as a source. Conservatives complain about youtube,then use it as a source. There are other examples,but this should be sufficient.
2007-10-20 05:24:10 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Most people always do what's useful to them at the time, regardless of consistency.
2007-10-20 05:33:49 · answer #1 · answered by mommanuke 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes -- I wouldn't cite a source unless I believed it.
Exception -- if I was quoting someone else, and the cite was only to show where the quote came from -- then I would sometimes use it for that purpose even if I didn't believe the content itself.
And the example you list are part of the problem with making broad generalizations -- attacking an entire industry and then using one media outlet for a source -- all that does is show that the person making the generalized attack is being either hypocritical or lazy.
2007-10-20 05:49:20 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
at the start non-Christians at the instant are not unavoidably atheists. There are particularly some different religions who've a deity or deities. Secondly, with out any data to the different that's lifelike to think of there is not any God, that not faith, this is scienctific. that's as much as believers to coach there's a god. The "data" of there not being a God is there is not any data that a God exists. The bible is purely a e book that exchange into written over 1500 years in the past and the complexity of existence has superior over the previous few million years, neither practice the existence of a God, if there is rather an all-seeing all-understanding being then quite there must be greater data than an fairly previous e book. i'm an atheist, i comprehend there is not any God because of the fact if he have been a exceptional being there may well be no murders, no famines, and so on, and so on. You ask us to offer you scientific data of there being no God. besides the shown fact that, as i've got pronounced you have not offered any scientific data for God latest.
2016-11-09 00:41:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only source I cite is my own bias, that way I avoid others'.
2007-10-20 05:30:40 · answer #4 · answered by You are all, weirdos. 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i leave source blank.. if it is not from life experience or work related.to my field... if you give a source.. you should present.. another source from opposite view.
2007-10-20 05:38:07 · answer #5 · answered by foosieboy1953 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I read about it.i trust no site nor opinions. And i read about it in several newspapers and News stations.
2007-10-20 05:36:41 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-10-20 08:40:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋