or do you just take a chance and hope for the best?
2007-10-20 01:22:56 · 17 answers · asked by LOL 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I usually like to make decisions ahead of time but I have learned to let go and just take a chance - lucky for me those times have paid off :)
2007-10-20 03:23:21 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Seems to me they are both some same thing. An expected outcome of your decision would most likely be the best outcome, otherwise you wouldn't make that decision. The fact that you are also hoping for that outcome doesn't really differentiate the two. A more suitable wording to your question might be, "Do you make a decision based on certain facts and probabilities, or do you just take a chance and hope for the best?"
2007-10-20 01:42:16 · answer #2 · answered by bootedbylibsx2 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We have some great comedians in Answers--thanks for the laughs!!!
For your question...expectation will lead to disappointment more often than not--it is a "want" force, which creates that very experience--wanting. Ever hear the expression "How does it feel to want?". First thought is our most trustworthy resource when it comes to decision making--soul sounds are not always the loudest, but they are the first, and should be heeded for the outcome that will provide the experience you need to have. How we deal with the outcomes is what wisdoms are borne from...and on our merry way we go!!!
2007-10-20 01:43:00 · answer #3 · answered by MsET 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Take a chance and hope for the best.
2007-10-20 01:26:13 · answer #4 · answered by Max A 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The first one because the expected outcome is hard to choose if what the outcome is.
2007-10-20 01:26:37 · answer #5 · answered by ♫Di [Pro-Love, Anti-Hate]♫ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
With me it depends on the situation at hand but mostly I take a chance and just go with the flow.
2007-10-20 01:30:02 · answer #6 · answered by ♆Şрhĩņxy - Lost In Time. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
a million) The individuals had broken the eastern code and knew an attack on halfway exchange into coming. 2) The individuals sent out their provider fleet early and have been given earlier than the eastern sub wooden line. They have been then able to ambush the eastern. 3) The individuals have been able to looking the eastern fleet first, and get their planes into the air from halfway earlier the attack- even to launch a bomber attack first (which did no injury). the eastern then had to objective and deliver a 2d attack to get the planes. 4) the american distributors have been able to looking the eastern distributors first. They released first. 5) the eastern finally detected one American provider. They have been interior the midst of reloading planes to attack the airfield at halfway. they had to resign and start to rearm for deliver attack. 6) the american planes did not arrive without notice. The torpedo planes have been given there first, and did not watch for the dive bombers to reach, yet went ideal in. The eastern air conceal and anti air protection shot all of them down- yet then the combatants have been all down at sea point while the american dive bombers arrived and attacked. 7) With planes reloading and refueling on deck, the dive bombers made hits that led to huge fires and secondary explosions which destoryed the enemy distributors.
2016-11-09 00:19:25 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I generally base them on common sense. But sometimes, you have to take that leap, and hope it all comes out all right.
2007-10-20 01:26:31 · answer #8 · answered by Jinxyblue 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the decision that needs made.
2007-10-20 01:29:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I take a lot of chances.
2007-10-20 01:26:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋