2007-10-20 01:13:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
All of creation proves a Creator...the universe and life on earth or anywhere else cannot have started by itself. Where did the original matter and the laws of nature come from? The universe is finite because of the laws of entropy. Life cannot form from non-living matter. The informational code of DNA is too complex and compact to have begun on it's own. Many other problems with naturalism make it a false assumption or belief.
2007-10-20 03:00:29 · answer #1 · answered by paul h 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the Bible has always proved the existence of God. Science discoveries have at many occasions proved that the Bible is right, for e.g: scientists at NASA have concluded that there is gap of 2 days in the history of time, and the answer lied in the Bible, when God listened to Joshua and the sun stood still for a day - there was no night at all, and the other one was in the case of Iasiah where the same happened. Moreover, the Bible states that when Jesus' Comes for the second time, the Mount of Olives will split in two, scientists have already found cracks starting to form on that Mountain. Thus, science can never contradict what the Bible says, for every events in the Bible are starting to be fullfilled.
2007-10-20 08:42:52 · answer #2 · answered by varghese p 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There isn't any.
Just proof that the universe is 13.7 billion years old and not 6000 and proof that evolution is responsible for the lifeforms we see around us and not some magical act of creation.
You should ask what evidence there is to believe in god in the first place. If there's none, maybe you shouldn't.
You can't prove a negative. If you want to say you believe in everything that hasn't been disproven you'll believe in EVERYTHING that doesn't exist. That would be insane.
2007-10-20 08:18:12 · answer #3 · answered by Leviathan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None, science does not seek evidence for or against god. Early scientists used observation and experience (experimental examination) of nature, and denied supernatural explanations of natural phenomena. Science has gone through much revision through the years but still follows this basic tenant, which is why science is fundamentally different than belief systems (faith).
2007-10-20 08:25:41 · answer #4 · answered by Niotulove 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is NO evidence. I dont belive in a god, however science doesnt prove against it.
It just proves that what people say is done by god can be explained in a logical and scientific way.
2007-10-20 08:16:08 · answer #5 · answered by Funky G 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your questions betrays a fundamental misunderstanding about what science is. Science is the study of the pattern of events in nature. Studying this pattern tells us nothing about the likelihood of some agent outside of nature feeding new events into this pattern.
2007-10-20 08:55:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is none and there never was. Science does not attempt to prove or disprove the existence of any God.
2007-10-20 08:23:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read the Case for Christ written by Lee Strobel. and you will be convinced that God actually exists.
2007-10-20 10:39:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
"God" is not an entity that can be proven or disproven by conventional scientific study, so it is impossible to have "scientific evidence against god."
"God" is based in faith, not carbon-dating and lab rats.
2007-10-20 08:17:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only theories against god is darwins evolution , it is only defended coz its the only way to ignore god. science cant ignore god . www.harunyahya.com refutation to athesim section provides good knowledge
2007-10-20 08:45:27 · answer #10 · answered by Acid 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋