i remember cast away, tom hanks and wilson.
2007-10-19 21:57:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I know from past experience I have gone over thirty days without interaction with another person and had no problem, but having someone to talk to just in case is a lot better.
2007-10-19 22:03:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by ☮ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ ☮ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Does that include the internet? It's 1:57 in the morning and I'm sitting here alone answering random questions online. So I guess I'm proving I could right now.
2007-10-19 21:56:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bones 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Don't think i could survive with out a computer!
2007-10-19 21:58:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Erick 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
All you need is food, water, air, and occasional sleep. Everything else is just a convenience. One time I went three months without talking to anyone. I don't need anyone to talk to, but I do enjoy occasional conversation.
2007-10-19 21:57:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jean-Francois 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nope
2007-10-19 22:17:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Survive yes, maintain sanity, doubtful.
2007-10-19 22:17:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by joe 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Survive but I'd be slightly more insane than I am already.
2007-10-20 01:44:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by ♆Şрhĩņxy - Lost In Time. 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
talk as in verbalize? with voice? easily. can go entire days without saying a single word, and have. talk as in type answers to questions like this, prob not.
2007-10-19 22:04:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Absolutely! Sounds like bliss :)
2007-10-19 21:57:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ah, not only would I survive, I'd thrive!
2007-10-19 21:56:28
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋