This first article can be interpreted in several different ways. It COULD mean it would be easy for the McCanns to do it, but it would be even easier for an abductor to have done it. These newspapers really DO contradict themselves on a regular basis, first it's "no evidence against the McCanns", then it's, "there was a corpse in the car", then it's, "Kate and Gerry will have to return to Portugal for further questioning", and now it's, "Kate and Gerry will not be questioned further at this stage". Is any of this conclusive? No. It just shows no one knows what they are talking about. We only have two facts at this point:
1. Madeleine McCann is missing.
2. Her parents and Robert Murat are suspects, but claim to be innocent.
2007-10-20 02:58:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
IF that is true, then it puts even more suspicion on to the McCanns. The article also says that both the McCanns and their friends were away from the table for more than three minutes each time, and that there was no way the 'abductor' could have taken Madeleine on foot without being seen, and as far as we know, nobody has reported seeing a car outside the apartment that night. We have to bear in mind though that we can't believe what's printed in the media. This article does have direct quotes, but we don't know how they have been twisted. The trouble is that the media print so many conflicting stories, nobody knows what to believe. I just pray that Madeleine is still alive, and is found safe and well.
2007-10-19 22:08:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
4⤋
That was a good guess. It really took them 3 minutes 24 seconds to dump Madelene's body.
2007-10-19 23:21:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes it must be true, you read it in a newspaper, it gets worse as now you think they must have done it and dumped the body as it would have only taken 3 minutes.
2007-10-20 01:59:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by pauline will never give up.xx 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bollocks.
If that were the case then searchers would have found her almost as quickly.
Scent of a corpse in church eh? I wonder where they carry out funeral services.
2007-10-20 00:49:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
well if they can run that fast we should have them in our olympic team!! ffs let it drop till substantial hard evidence is available
2007-10-20 01:52:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mossy Jan 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I see that you're still spouting rubbish.
2007-10-21 01:52:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by GoreyAlan Fáilte 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The problem is, they are not digging enough places up. The search is not very intense.
2007-10-19 22:39:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chris 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
Yeah,more "damning evidence",I think you should let the police know what you have come up with,they are experts where rumour is concerned.
2007-10-19 22:14:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
7⤋
You said
"We read with horror"
More like you read with relish that it would only take three minutes to dispose of little Madeleine's body.
You keep on say the word WE. Is that you and your multiple accounts?
2007-10-19 21:23:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tabbyfur aka patchy puss 5
·
7⤊
9⤋