Why do Republicans think poor approval of congress is good for bush when USA really want Congress to impeach?

Question

…and especially when polls show even more dismal approval of any Republican whatsoever.

LINK
http://www.pollingreport.com/cong2008.htm

I think impeaching would be a waste of time, and that bush should continue to be held up as an example of Republicanism.

Answer 1

ITS IS AMAZING HOW HATEFUL AND IGNORANT THE REPUBLICANS ARE...AFTER ALL THE LIES, ALL THE PROOF, AND ALL THE DELIBERATE LAW BREAKING DONE BY bush (SIC) THEY STILL HOLD FAST TO THIER FALSE BELIEFS AND INHUMANE TREATMENTS OF PEOPLE HERE AND ABROAD....YOU ARE ALL MONSTERS...AND WILL HAVE TO ANSWER FOR IT TO GOD!!!!!!!! SO HATE ON REPUB'S HATE ON...BESIDES LYING ITS THE THING YOU DO BEST!!!

Answer 2

You should try to get your facts from a reliable source. The USA does not want to impeach "W". Only a few ignorant Liberals have called for that. He has not committed any crimes. Just because you disagree with him does not mean he can be impeached.
Congress has discovered that getting out of Iraq is not as simple as sending the troops home as they promised when they were running. If we have a Democratic President next time He or She will not be able to do that either.

Answer 3

Wow... not sure where to start on this one... but I shall try.

This constant drumbeat for impeachment of G.W Bush is an interesting one. In fact, there are no grounds for impeachment of a President who presented the United States Congress with the same intelligence he had at the time on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. In fact, there are several documented cases of the same suspicions being stated as fact by Bill Clinton when he was President, as well as statements made by many members of Congress both before and after President Bush was elected in November of 2000.

I should also point out that Congress voted to give President Bush the authority to use force to remove Saddam Hussein from power, so there is nothing "illegal" about this "war." They saw that evidence and they chose the same course for our country. A majority of the people in the United States also supported the removal of this brutal dictator on the grounds that his presence constituted a real threat to our national security. Would you agree that, if impeachment of President Bush were to take place, all of the members Congress should also come up on similar charges for this "illegal" war?

Here's my take on the entire issue. I believe that what we are seeing here is a toxic hatred for this President that stems from the Presidential election fiasco of 2000. I know that I became physically ill watching my country's election system come under fire by those that would have the rules changed after the voting process had taken place. That is historically unprecedented. As a Libertarian, I believe that my views on the subject are pretty unbiased.

You simply cannot start inspecting cards for the "intent" of voters based solely on the fact that some voters were simply too incompetent to follow instructions and make sure the chad was not dangling from their ballots before handing them in to the poll workers. Additionally, the "confusing" ballot design was approved by those committees designed to do just that - make sure that the system met legal standards and would not intentionally mislead voters to choose one candidate over another.

Now... all of this said, let me make peace with the Left, whose continual assault on this President has left the field of public debate on many an issue so toxic that healthy, honest debate based on fact can no longer take place. I am ready for a change of Presidents. I voted for Bush in both elections. My votes were motivated by economic and national security concerns. Social experimentation within the government media complex is a useless distraction from those issues which truly matter to our country's survival.

While I believe that this President's actions and decisions are noble, of good intention, and in our country's best interest, the political environment in which we currently live is not good for the country. Healthy debate must return. The leftist regimes of George Soros have too great an influence - an influence that I believe would not be possible had it not been for the divisive 2000 election fiasco and the resulting hatred for G.W. Bush.

So... the beauty of the impending "regime change" is that, unlike most countries on this planet, it will occur peacefully. I pray that whoever loses the election this time around will have the dignity and integrity to adopt the winning candidate as their President so that we can get back to more important issues like Social Security, National Security, and Alternative Energy.

Thank you for your time.

Sauce

P.S. - Have the respect to capitalize the title and name of your President when addressing him in writing.

Answer 4

oh puhlease, look at the numbers again...bushs approval is THREE TIMES what the out of contol liberals have. did you "forget" that nothing gets done without the approval of the pelosi/reid regime and there you go whining about what you dont have...public support. excellent spin but very little base in reality...do us all a favor...get a life.

Answer 5

than you would have to also impeach Clinton for telling Bush that he thought Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. also, most republicans and democrats thought so and both wanted war. liberals seem to forget that part.

Answer 6

The USA does not want Congress to impeach. Nice try, silly liberal.

Answer 7

I love it when liberals think that everyone in the world shares their thoughts.

I'll explain this to you slowly so you can follow along:

Bush has broken no laws.
You have to have broken a law to be impeached.
If you disagree, please hold your breath until the impeachment trials begin.