Harry Reid tries to take credit for the Limbaugh Ebay letter, always saying "we" in his speech as if he was part of it.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html
Not to mention, ABC made it sound in a statement that the democrats were the ones responsible for the money donated to charity from the letter.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2007/10/19/abc-tries-credit-democrats-rushs-2-million-ebay-letter
2007-10-19 20:58:12 · 10 answers · asked by Adolf Schmichael 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Reid is a complete loser. Why does Nevada put up with this nut? I have been to Nevada and find it to be full of sane and rational people. How does this buffoon keep getting reelected?
Lets recap; he tries to subvert the First Amendment by using a government institution to silence his political enemy. When the political enemy simulataniosly embarrasses him and raises millions for charity, he tries to take credit for the charity portion without giving a dime.
Sorry Nevada.
Rush donated 2.2 million to match the E Bay bid. Great day for the Marine Law Enforcement Fund and free speech. Bad day for socialists and wannabe dictators.
2007-10-19 21:04:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
I used to laugh when I would read some over-the-top Yahoo! poster referring to Harry Reid as "that Liberal bed-wetter", but the phrase now seems to have a solid ring of truth to it.
In the book, "Do What I Say, Not As I Do: Profiles In Liberal Hypocrisy", one shocking truth is revealed: while Conservatives are almost always punished for their hypocrisy, Liberals are routinely rewarded for theirs!!!
Harry Reid is a prime example. This wimpy, bed-wetting Liberal has the gall to worm his way into taking credit? That would be like the losing team in a basketball match being interviewed after the game, and the coach says, "Yeah, the outcome of the game should be credited to us, because we did not prevail, so the winners owe their victory to us".
This is nutty Harry Reid-esque Liberal "logic".
I love this quote about the whole situation from newsbusters:
"Harry Reid LIES on the floor of the Senate. Harry Reid FAILS to get support from his own party for the effort. The Democrats create a FAKE controversy to help deflect from their supporter’s outrageous attack on one of our most decorated soldiers. And ABC lets Harry Reid take CREDIT for this charitable donation like HE was the one responsible for it."
2007-10-20 08:34:39 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The New York Times as well as ABC failed to mention that Rush Limbaugh matching the the price of the letter which brings the donation to over 4 million dollars to the Marines!
The gall of these senators to sign something they have not looked into (are they sheep?), and then when it slaps them in the face, they try to turn it around to their advantage! Hillary's signature is on this letter. Is she planning on conducting the presidency on false premises too?
Progressives? I think not!!
2007-10-20 07:22:27 · answer #3 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think that Harry Reid's all time low is also the US Congress' all time low.
Harry lost the "phony soldier" war, and he soiled himself by trying to take credit for the amount of money raised by that letter.
Phony soldiers are those who claim benefits they haven't earned and claim to have seen attrocities in Iraq but have never even been there (as in that McBeth guy).
Ironically, these phony soldiers (I call them frauds) are the ones being propped up by the democrats because liars are the only people they can find to oppose the war in Iraq. Real soldiers are too busy reenlisting to be interviewed.
2007-10-20 04:05:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Reid is a scumbag. His speech in the senate is a farce. He does not care about the troops. He should demand censor for the dishonorable congressman Stark from California.
2007-10-20 09:54:29 · answer #5 · answered by David_the_Great 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully Reid is a has been , as far as future politics goes. Democrats love to demand apoligies and demand that people step down. Well well.....why don't they apoligize? Why aren't they stepping down???? Double standard !!
2007-10-20 13:11:46 · answer #6 · answered by Sweet Tea & Lemons 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Reid is an admitted shmuck and bias media are his henchman! How low will those snakes go?
2007-10-20 04:02:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
What he did was a complete travesty, and for anyone who
is paying attention, it proved that he is a scumbag!
2007-10-20 05:46:06 · answer #8 · answered by realitycheck 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Harry Reid is a jackass.
2007-10-20 04:08:12 · answer #9 · answered by libs are traitors 1 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Ahh, the liberal spin machine. Dontcha just love it!
2007-10-20 04:02:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋