So I just watched this movie, Because I Said So, and that almost happens in the movie and my initial reaction was like eew that isnt even legal! But my friend said it was! So which one is right?
If you didnt understand the question it would be like your partner's parents marrying one of your own parents
2007-10-19 18:40:10 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
yes, no blood relation means its legal
2007-10-19 18:43:43 · answer #1 · answered by **leigh** 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Legally i guess they can but it does not sound right. I guess if they really love each other then you should be happy for them. There is a special someone out there for everyone and maybe they are each others special one.
2007-10-20 01:49:19 · answer #2 · answered by hope i can help 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as they are not blood relations in the first degree, there should be no legal problem.
However, it may be kind of creepy when the folks visit and get frisky; you and your spouse may start feeling like sister and brother.
2007-10-20 01:43:43 · answer #3 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course it's legal.
2007-10-20 01:50:53 · answer #4 · answered by pepper 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Legal . But the idea is repulsive and nauseating.
2007-10-20 01:49:22 · answer #5 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, they can....but I'd be interested how they'd call each other.......son/daughter-in-law and stepmother/father ....... and the children???/
2007-10-20 02:27:09 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are not related by blood, you can marry. Period.
2007-10-20 01:44:03 · answer #7 · answered by dov20051 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but only in Kentucky...or any state south of it.
2007-10-20 02:59:41 · answer #8 · answered by Jeremiah 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, not in the eyes of the Lord.
2007-10-20 02:44:43 · answer #9 · answered by Dakota Lynn Takes Gun 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋