English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Perhaps there could be a bill called the Anti-Right-Wing Nutcase Marriage and Reproduction Act.

2007-10-19 15:42:29 · 25 answers · asked by Angelique 2 in Politics & Government Government

25 answers

Wow that sounds so great don't tease me....

2007-10-19 15:45:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I would support that ban. If they can ban gay marriages and the right of a woman to choose, then a ban on them [Republicans] would be a "wake-up" call to them. To suggest that having same-sex marriages would lead to polygamy is nuts.

Whites and blacks could not marry in the past and it's the same crap like Romney said to a disabled youth regarding medical use of marijuana. He evaded the question simply by saying he did not support medical use of marijuana. The youth only asked him if he [Romney] would have him arrested for using it. The disabled youth did not ask if he supported medical use of marijuana; his question was would Romney support his arrest for using it. The question was never answered.

Hopefully when Madam President is inaugurated, such things will be addressed upon merit and necessity.

2007-10-19 22:59:38 · answer #2 · answered by Boomer 5 · 0 1

Why not? There's a non-proliferation clause for liberals. It's called Roe vs Wade.

2007-10-19 22:57:05 · answer #3 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 0 0

Yeah, But the Freaks can
Desi-grate the sacred Mass!l....agree that is how ridiculous things have gotten...and I guess the next thing we will see
"God " taken off the dollar....and then we really will be Godless!

...I do not think our Forefathers wanted "Freedom" from Religion!

..I took your question as being facetious, but if you are serious, then you will realize that the family oriented Religious people only have Children they can afford....

2007-10-19 22:48:45 · answer #4 · answered by Rada S 5 · 1 1

No but I would support the installation of a strait jacket and wiring the jaws shut of most liberals. It would be easy. Take a few and the rest are too dumb to come up with an original or intelligent question.

2007-10-19 22:48:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

No -- to be consistent -- I have to support reproductive choice for everyone -- even the people trying to take over.

2007-10-19 22:59:27 · answer #6 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 2

I dont get married on a regular basis and i dont know the answer!!! good luck hope you find what you are looking for!!!

2007-10-19 22:45:10 · answer #7 · answered by JaneSays 2 · 0 0

We're here. We're not leaving until everyone agrees with us. We win with the power of ideas that work...like freedom and security.

PS Tell Hillary we're sorry those FBI files haven't seemed to work.

2007-10-19 22:46:50 · answer #8 · answered by shaken & stirred 3 · 1 2

That was a cheap shot sister.
I am republican..want to go out tomorrow night?

2007-10-19 22:46:21 · answer #9 · answered by Ruth 7 · 1 1

no because that would make me a hypocrite, and hypocrites are the kind of people i hate most...I believe that everyone should have the privilege of marriage (including homosexuals) and if I supported a ban on any group of people for marriage that would make me a hypocrite...no thanks.

2007-10-19 22:46:29 · answer #10 · answered by Ruthie 7 · 2 1

only if we can sterilize uber marxists like you
and remove their vocal cords so we are not forced tohear that shrill little whining voice

2007-10-20 03:36:17 · answer #11 · answered by 1 free American 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers