True or False? An entrapment defense must include the involvement of a law enforcement officer or agent.?

Answer 1

True -- though "agent" means anyone acting for (on behalf of) the govt -- not just a "law enforcement agent" in the "officer/agent" sense.

Answer 2

entrapment is a legal defense by which a defendant may argue that he or she should not be held criminally liable for actions which broke the law, because he/she was induced (or entrapped) by the police to commit those acts. For the defense to be successful, the defendant must demonstrate that the police induced an otherwise unwilling person to commit a crime. Entrapment is an issue that must be considered in designing sting operations, as well as vice operations, particularly those involving kerb crawling, prostitution and (In the United Kingdom) soliciting.

Answer 3

Any one can be set up,even if your not really
involved.
BUT law entrapment must HAVE LAW AGENTS INVOLVED.

Answer 4

True...but law enforcement can be pretty broad and extend to school "police" and the DA's office as well.

Answer 5

fake. Their are circumstances while an officer can enter your assets without warrant. through fact i don't be attentive to your be attentive to-how of regulation (regulation is extremely complicated subject count up for interpritation for this reason each and all the legal expert) i'll purely touch on the basics. in case you like greater ingredient seek for suggestion from an legal expert or your regulation library in case you sense gentle including your be attentive to-how. Officer could enter your assets decrease than right here circumstances: a) officer is invited interior by potential of member of the kinfolk b) officer is responding to a 911 call and is interior the technique of examine. varieties of 911 calls that should fall decrease than this may well be life dangerous calls which includes kinfolk disturbances, theft / housebreaking in progression, etc. Calls which includes loud occasion does no longer qualify. c) officer is investigating an alarm and your house of residing is unsecured d) officer is in warm pursuit and suspect runs into your house of residing e) exigent circumstances exist that's important notice that activities ought to be concerning to the circumstances listed above. case in point, an officer won't be able to enter your house of residing through fact your battling including your companion and then start up dealing with your drawers searching for drugs. Permission of the owner of a house is often legal and ok. in the adventure that your assets is a company, the officer can flow everywhere the commonplace public can flow without warrant. it is likewise important to notice that regardless if a company or place of residing, something unlawful it is in ordinary view and could be seen from a worry-loose section is honest pastime regardless of the place it became. case in point you invite an officer into your place to document a criticism and mutually as interior he sees a bag of narcotics protruding of your drawer. even nevertheless the drawer is seen inner maximum, the narcotics have been in ordinary view and the officer became interior lawfully for this reason he ought to retrieve them and seek the drawer without warrant. As I stated that's no longer a sparkling decrease subject. they have college classes dedicated to easily masking this one subject count and that's and constantly would be up for interpritation. If my answer did no longer assist you to i might seek for suggestion from with an legal expert or flow on your regulation library (loose) and look it up.

Answer 6

Are we taking a t/f law test?

Answer 7

Who cares he's guilty he's a pos republican trying to make it seem that he's not gay when he really is! Typical republican bull ****!

Answer 8

False.

You can be set up by anyone.