English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think dog fighting and rooster /c*ck fighting is cruel just as many people do, BUT yet we will lure 18 year olds right out of high school to go to war in Iraq for the big oil companies and defense contractors, even though our lawmakers say that 18 year olds are too young to make the choice to smoke tobacco or drink whiskey. It is legal to become a porn actor at age 18 which is FAR too young to make that choice in my opinion. I mean they are not smart enough be trusted with cigarettes or alcohol right, so how can an 18 year old be mature enough to choose to be in porn movies? They pay through the nose for car insurance because they are too immature right?
Campaign contributions from the porn industry, hollywood, and large companies involved is what it is all about isn't it? Am I wrong? Men can beat eachother's heads in at boxing. We can imprison baby calves from birth to death in dark barns for tender veal. Look up what is done to get veal and tell me that is not evil as hell.

2007-10-19 14:24:22 · 5 answers · asked by OceanBlue0910 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

The wierd part is you actually trying to compare the two.

Dog/chicken fighters did not fly planes into the World Trade Center, and Dogs/Chickens can not fight a war.

How about you try again?

2007-10-19 14:35:36 · answer #1 · answered by trooper3316 7 · 1 1

We DON'T 'lure' 18 year olds into war. 18 year olds VOLUNTEER to join the military to DEFEND the country. They KNOW when they enlist, especially for the past 6 years, that they could be sent to war. As the standard enlistment period is SHORTER than the time we have been at war in Iraq, EVERYONE currently serving either enlisted or reenlisted KNOWING for certain they would be deployed.

2007-10-19 15:44:20 · answer #2 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0 0

Man, you're just full of opinions, aren't ya.

If a chicken could have found and brought Saddam to justice, we would have sent them.

Chickens don't do that.

Hadda send 18 year olds.

P.S. Cowards always justify their opinions by blaming Big oil and Defense Contractors.

You don't look good in that chicken suit.

2007-10-19 14:30:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

have you ever been around those horses and seen how they're taken care of??? in case you had, you will possibly know how stupid your question sounds. those horses are taken care of like kings. till now they're even seen for racing, they're checked via the vet (x-rays to be sure the ft, scopes to be sure the throat and digestive gadget, etc.). in the event that they're stumbled directly to be undeserving for racing, they're given to residences to stay a diverse race. I knew a horse that had vulnerable ankles and he replaced into given away to a sparkling homestead. additionally, the horses that are raced can get injured, yet maximum folk of them get better. whether that's in simple terms too volatile for them to race, they're pulled and given to new residences. From working at a thoroughbred farm for 3 years, I even have in simple terms know one horse that mandatory to be positioned down from a racing harm (he had a harm from his shoes, that could have befell in any interest, which comprise working in the sector). dogs that are positioned into the combating ring are left to die in the event that they lose, at the same time as horses are taken care of. additionally, do you know how lots it expenses to look after those horses? the fee of hay has sky rocketed alongside with each and every little thing else. The farms that are elevating those horses are sturggling with the charges, yet they be sure the horses are taken care of. have you ever heard of a dogs combating ring that keeps all their dogs healthful? No. Get your information immediately and do a splash learn. Edit: quote "mr good judgment..permit me take a whip on you for terribly almost 1mile and 1 / 4..." have you ever ridden? The crop would not harm the horse. it relatively is in simple terms there to remind them of what they're meant to be doing. in simple terms the few merciless riders use it incorrect. once you employ it, you in simple terms provide a faucet on the horse's area. that's adequate to maintain it moving.

2016-10-04 04:52:13 · answer #4 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

I think this is my favorite question ever that incorporates drinking, porn, cockfighting and veal. Nice job!

2007-10-19 17:16:46 · answer #5 · answered by J P 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers