how are we able to see what the milky way looks like when we are in it?

Answer 1

Most of the pictures you see of the Milky Way are composites pulled together from different telescopes using different wavelength sensitivites.
Visible light is only a small fraction of the electromagnetic spectrum, so even though we can't see something in visible light, we can still detect it using infrared, radio, ultraviolet, and other wavelengths.

We can't see most of the Milky Way because of the large dust clouds (called nebula) along the inner and outer edges of the spiral arms (we're in between 2 spiral arms).

And other galaxies that we can see completely do have many similarities to our own galaxy in shape and form, so scientists use those other galaxies as 'templates' to help fill in some of the gaps in observational data.

Answer 2

We our on one of the outer arms of the milky way spiral galaxy. So when people saw that they take photo graphs of the milyway, they usually mean they are looking towards the core or center of the galaxy. It shows many more stars and together they form a band of glowing white (hence the "milky way") across the sky. We have a very good persective view of the most of the galaxy because we are on the edge.

Answer 3

I would Imagine that you first catalog all possible stars that might be in our galaxy. Then you would find the distance from here to there and make somewhat of a 3-D model. Add in the stars you can barely see from behind other stars, un Vuala! Milky way from Inside Milky Way.

Answer 4

we can see a band or an arm of the milky way and scientist used this clue to compare it with other fully visible galaxy
the spiral shape had arms so scientist just used that

Answer 5

Because we are on the edge of the milky way galaxy, so when you look into it you are seeing the middle and other outer parts.

Answer 6

We can guess what it looks like by taking panoramic photos of the entire night sky and then putting them together. Like this:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap051004.html
As there is loads of gas and dust obscuring our view, like trees would if you are in a forest, this picture actually only shows a small fraction of the Milky Way. But you would still realize you were in a forest if you had ever seen another:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040123.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap040409.html

"Tyger, Tyger burning bright
in the forest of the night..."

Answer 7

That's a f u c k i n g awesome question. "how are we able to see what the milky way looks like when we are in it?"'it should be on a buildboard' :)

Answer 8

Look at yourself: can you see your own legs? Your own arms? But unless you have access to a mirror, you cannot see your own ears.

What we see are the parts of our galaxy that are visible from where we are, same as you looking at your own arm. But just as you canot see ypourself in your entirity, we cannot see all of our galaxy, some partsare hiding others. This meant that the actual size of our galaxy was the object of confliction estimatios, and even now, its actual size is not fully known.

Answer 9

The same way you can see what your house looks like while you are in it. You see the inside. We really don't know for sure exactly what it looks like from outside.

Answer 10

it style of feels to be the case; certainly, curiously our galaxy incorporates countless billions of planets! This become an insoluble secret till extremely those days, for the straightforward undeniable truth that different stars are rather some distance away and planets, in evaluation, are vanishingly small. yet via quite some concepts, many times concerning recognizing periodic wobbles contained in the action of stars with the aid of their planets' gravitational outcomes, 1000's of extrasolar planets were found contained in the finest decade. This detection technique is heavily skewed in route of searching "warm Jupiters", that are gas massive planets in very close orbits to their host favourite individual, because those large planets % up make a higher wobble than an Earthlike planet at a liveable distance might want to. there has been one probably liveable planet found, it really is a terrestrial (i.e. rocky) planet with water vapour in its ecosystem that has about 5 situations Earth's gravity. If it seems to be extremely inhabitable, regardless of the truth that, any colonists might want to ought to spend their time in transit getting adapted to a extreme gravity ecosystem upon arrival, likely by technique of rotating the spacecraft at a extreme cost. Then the colonists might want to evolve to live to inform the tale there, positively starting to be short and effectual like Tolkien's dwarves. they could have time to modify in this vacation because it maximum likely might want to take many many millennia. yet opportunities are extreme we are able to not ought to hotel to that. interior a decade the Terrestrial Planet Finder area telescope will be released, an large scope with the resolving skill to promptly image Earthlike planets round different stars. once those are found and catalogued, that is likely to take centuries to strengthen the technologies mandatory for interstellar commute because, as i discussed, those stars are in basic terms so danged some distance away! it may also be mandatory to strengthen terraforming technologies, because it isn't going that we are able to come across a planet it really is completely acceptable for us. for my section discover out a thanks to start up is to terraform Earth; if we are able to not opposite the outcome of our personal inhabitation the following then we don't have any top to stomp around the universe replacing different planets to healthful ourselves. besides, the artwork fascinated by returning Earth to its organic state and helping an cutting-edge biosphere is trivial compared to the enormous interest of coming up a biosphere from scratch elsewhere.