Why?
2007-10-19 14:19:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Any more photogenics? We need more of them for us women to vote on.
2007-10-19 14:58:05 · update #1
Any more photogenics? We need more of them for us women to vote on.
2007-10-19 14:58:09 · update #2
hilary and mitt
hilary cuz of her hubby and the people seem to be ready for an historical change in the white house
mitt not realy a chance but he doas have a seemingly good looking family..kinda the jfk of the republican party..
2007-10-19 15:01:01 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If the American people do not awake from their slumber they will follow what their TV's say and vote for the two that have already been bought and paid for by the elite running this country Guliani and Hillary.
If the American people are smart and many are waking up in mass numbers which is very exciting We will put Ron Paul into office for the people's needs and privacy and not the governments. He has proven his case for over twnety years being the outsider in congress because he cannot be bought.
A noble man in a sea of waste. He has more itelligence and experience than all candidates combined for none of the other follow our constitution which if followed would keep our nation strong and proud. Research the truth we now have a man representing the truth in our names. This Ron Paul revolution is the people's campaign, Join us it is passionate and patriotic, feel good about your country again.
2007-10-19 21:46:02 · answer #2 · answered by stephenmwells 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It'll be Hilery vs either Guliani or Romney
I like the Rep in this order
1 Romney
2 Thompson
3 Guliani
I see Romney with the most money , Governor of a big state, and very photogenic as the best bet to beat any of the Dumos
2007-10-19 21:23:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm over here in Australia having fun watching the circus - all I know is that there will be lots of mud thrown around, lots of lies, lots of good old fashioned hate - should be lots of entertainment.
I'm sorry you guys have it for real - makes out Howard/Rudd brawl look tame.
For what its worth - I think Hillary (cause she's got the money & Bill) vs anyone the Religious Right and the GOP can agree upon (and thats not Guliani).
2007-10-20 09:34:22 · answer #4 · answered by fordfalcon1953 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As the campaign goes on and on and on and on and on and ...you get the idea- [eople will get sick of seeing these faces every night on TV and in the newspapers. We're going to OD on Hillary. Obama, McCain, etc etc etc.
I foresee one of the parties, sensing trouble in the pre election polls, bringing out a new candidate at the conventions, someone with a fresh face and fresh ideas.
OK. I do admit having a 2nd glass of wine with dinner, but- my thoughts, Tom Ridge.
Former gov of PA and director of Homeland Security for the GOP, but I cannot think of an "ace up the sleeve" candidate for the Dem party to replace Hillary.
2007-10-19 21:40:54 · answer #5 · answered by TedEx 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Romney V Billary
2007-10-19 23:54:43 · answer #6 · answered by LDS Mom 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary and Giuliani but the latter is in trouble with the Christian Evangelicals.
2007-10-19 21:49:41 · answer #7 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul
The reason: I want to be free!
2007-10-20 02:17:20 · answer #8 · answered by It's Me 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋