Just as some will base their logic in the scientific method, others will base their logic in the Bible. It would seem that if the true logic were in plain site, everyone would have made the corresponding shift to that logic by now.
Instead, you have one insisting that God's hand in the creation of the universe cannot be proved using the scientific method (thus debunking the religion), and another insisting that God is intuitive and the man responsible for all of this science by default - that he cannot be 'proven' is not the point.
Would you agree that the two sides are equally aggravating to listen to? :D Also feel free to comment on anything else relative to this.
2007-10-19
13:36:15
·
7 answers
·
asked by
craukymuvilla
2
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy