English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You know, no new taxes( her health care would cost less than Bush's war) would people still hate health care for the 'have-nots'

2007-10-19 13:18:12 · 7 answers · asked by Michael G 4 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

Any Health Care system is an improvement over the way things are right now.

We just need to get Universal Health Care, it can be tweaked to perfection later. We just need to keep the Insurance Companies and Drug Companies out of the debate, because they are very powerful lobbyist, who only care about making huge profits.

2007-10-19 13:24:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The problem with nationalized health care is it very poor quality and the wait times to get approval and actual care. I read news reports of people in Canada approval for a life saving procedure two weeks after that person had died of their condition. Some people with terminal illness are getting more priority then other, so in short a goverment agency is deciding who lives and who dies on a large scale through such a thing.

The other thing is the quality of nationalize health care is terrible. Any one remember the reports of Walter Reed Military Hospital and its terrible conditions? I was in the Army and these goverment ran and funded facilities are ALL like this to some degree. Not to mention the dental care in the UK
is underfunded and many people are pulling their own teeth then rather go see a goverment sponsored dentist. Do you really want to wish this on the American public?

The other alternative is what America has and its you do not have it, you die or go into debt. Neither is good as an option.

The solution? A balance between the two.

2007-10-19 20:43:10 · answer #2 · answered by PeguinBackPacker 5 · 0 0

Are you kidding me? The cost of providing Hilliary-care would surpass the cost of the war in a few years.

People don't hate the "have-nots" getting health care.
They know that a government health care system would be worst than what they are receiving now.

2007-10-19 21:05:13 · answer #3 · answered by Matt 2 · 0 1

We already have health care for the "have-nots"

2007-10-19 20:23:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Each one of us will pay in weekly a certain percentage of what we earn each week. Lets say 3 1/2 %. We will all pay the same PERCENTAGE and all get the same coverage. Plain simple and fair.

2007-10-19 20:26:35 · answer #5 · answered by Mezmarelda 6 · 0 0

apples and oranges. hillary is an out of control liberal with eyes on confiscatory taxes and failed welfare schemes. bush is cleaning up the clinton mess with integrity despite the grandstanding of the pelosi reid regime...two totally different things and not suitable for comparison.

2007-10-19 20:31:22 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 2

yes thy will

2007-10-19 20:22:30 · answer #7 · answered by paulcondo 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers