What is the definition and an example of Party Practices?

Answer 1

Party practices are the rules that are followed by members of political parties that are coherent with issues that they carry.

Answer 2

Party Practices Definition

Answer 3

This Site Might Help You.

RE:
What is the definition and an example of Party Practices?

Answer 4

For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/XaeS6

Neither Hindus are 83% of total population nor 30% muslims voted for BJP, where did you get that? It's a propaganda done by congress, arab and church money. Indeed, BJP also becomes a pseudo-secular party when it comes to implementation of their manifesto and that's the reason they are a loser. Muslims in Gujarat didn't vote for ideology of BJP rathar they voted for Modi’s style of functioning and governance. @ap - Savarkar and Golwalkar rightly said that Islam (muslims), the christians, the communists are enemy of not only hindu rashtra but humanity. Christianity destroyed innumerable innocent cultures of the world. It is only now, when christianity's violence is surpassed by Islam that you are witnessing a tolerant face of christianity. Communists yesterday (again) proved that both great men were correct. The less said about Islam, the better. Taslima Nasreeen, a muslim by birth, hasn't read the Koran but you aren't a hafiz either. @ap - Get your facts clear. Do you even know that Savarkar was an atheist ? How can an atheist be communal ?He even delivered lectures about non-existence of God. His criticism of abrahmic faiths and communists was from an atheist's perspective just like winston churchil's statement - " Islam in a man is as dangerous as rabies in a dog". Do you even know that your beloved congress party retained the Savarkar's definition of a hindu as the "legal definition" of "Hindu" (i.e. Indian citizen to whom the "Hindu law" concerning marriage and inheritance applies) in the Hindu Code of 1955, which applies the term "Hindu" for its purposes to Sikhs, Jainas and Buddhists and as a matter of fact to any Indian who is not a Parsi, Jew, Christian or Muslim". So, Savarkar's definition is very sensible both historically and legally. Only congress and its erudite supporters label the real patriots of motherland "communal". This is the only land of Hindus in world. Infact, hindus are hindus only because of their motherland. How can a hindu be anti-national when he is hindu only because of this nation ? "Antinational hindu" is the best oxymoron ever told. If any person loving his native culture and motherland is communal whereas the one loving "ummah" is secular then i would love to remain communal all through my life. Regarding Quran, I would say you aren't mature enough to debate the topic. So, savarkar was the father of pakistan. lol. Nothing can be more amusing than watching these unique species of secularists who can go to any extent, due to vote bank compulsions, to establish the tolerant nature of most intolerant faiths ever manufactured which reserves an eternal hell for them. .