If you haven't listened to him on AM KNEW then don't bother answering. I only want intelligent, thoughtful answers.
2007-10-19 09:48:13 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Over twenty million people have voted on his website to run.
2007-10-19 09:53:20 · update #1
I say is he can pull votes away from Hillary then I am all for it. Seriously though, while I think Savage is some good opinions I think when it came down to running the big business that is the United States (yes it is a business) then he would not do well. Talk radio serves its purpose by getting people involved with political ideas, however rarely do those radio personalities make it in the public arena when it comes to politics.
2007-10-19 11:45:06 · answer #1 · answered by Jaybo 2 · 0⤊ 6⤋
i does no longer vote for Michael Savage for President, if he ran, in general through fact he's basically too emotionally risky to be a competent President. He might make the comparable mistake that the Bush administration made out of appearing too unilaterally, different than he might take this unilateralism to even greater effective extremes that no longer even the dogmatic Bush administration might have dared to take it. He has spent lots of his political profession vilifying the full left by potential of characterizing the full left as sharing the comparable philosophy and features as people who're on the unconventional edge of the left wing flow. This predilection, by potential of Michael Savage, to portray the competition so unfairly, potential that he may well be basically too detrimental to cooperation, despite if that cooperation may well be good for the rustic. Having listened to Savage, on his instruct the Savage united states, and having examine his books “The Savage united states”, “The Enemy interior of”, and “Liberalism is A psychological affliction”, i will truthfully say that his own attitude is so skewed through previous injustices he perceived he became subject to, through political correctness from the left, that he would possibly never be a honest Commander and chief. Any guy who believes that international relatives is for the vulnerable, and extols the virtues of preemptive conflict shouldn’t be President of america. Any guy that believes selection has been basically deleterious to u.s. shouldn’t be President. Any guy who believes that we've been a greater useful united states interior the Nineteen Fifties than we are in the present day shouldn’t be President. Any guy who glorifies the barbarity contained interior the previous testomony, and believes that we ought to constantly be conscious such barbarism to in the present day’s international shouldn’t be President. So no, i wouldn't in any respect vote for him.
2016-10-13 05:18:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If ever a man had a perfect last name for his personalty. If that tool ever becomes prez. the terrorists could all go home. This country would tear itself up from the inside out. If you think Hillary is polarizing, just wait til you see that jackass give a speech.
BTW, Why do you ask for intelligent thoughtful answers? If that's what you want, you wouldn't listen to Michael Savage. Just ask for what you really want, answers that will tell you your right.
2007-10-19 10:45:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
He said he would run after 8 million votes. He will never run.
Hes great on some issues. However he fails to recognize the importance in electing Ron Paul to not only help us defeat islamic extremism, but maintain America!
Savage would surely agree with Paul that border security and ending birthright citizenship is a priority! However I have never herd Savage say anything beyond "Im not a big fan of Ron Paul".
I guess its better he had little, instead of alot to say about him lol
Bottom line, No.
I have herd Savage be pro 2nd amendment, then the next day question his views on the subject. It only lasted 10 minutes, but it is enough to show his views are not Constitutionally based, and that is EXACTLY what we need right now!
2007-10-19 11:02:34 · answer #4 · answered by vote_usa_first 7 · 0⤊ 7⤋
For all I know, he might be competent to do the job, but, he at least projects a persona of forthing madness unbefitting to the dignity of the Office. Like Gravel and Paul, though, he might make an amusing fringe candidate.
2007-10-19 10:05:14 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
yes ge could do to republicans what Ralph Nader did to democrats last 2x take away votes i would love him as independent candidate
2007-10-19 09:57:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
You never know it could help boost his ratings. That's basically why Colbert is running. Definetley can't hurt your ratings.
2007-10-19 09:51:12 · answer #7 · answered by Super Tuesday 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
No...
While I agree with MUCH of what he has to say, truthfully I am afraid that he would have liberals in gas chambers before too long... Not a good idea.
2007-10-19 10:08:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
That dude is crazy. I have heard his show, and if he did try to run it would just be a big waste of his time and money.
2007-10-19 09:52:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
I hope so, it would be funny to see his mighty ego bruised when he's crushed.
2007-10-19 10:40:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋