2007-10-19 09:18:39 · 11 answers · asked by Dirk von Pelvis 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
A big no on both, the last president that did that was Clinton. In his idiotic foray into Serbia and his reduction of the Military by 1/3.
2007-10-19 09:26:13 · answer #1 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
historical past has informed us that Vietnam war became into an unjust war, as a results of fact the U. S. supported the corrupt Diem and Thieu regimes. The war based on the "Domino concept" which has shown incorrect. So the U. S. engagement in Vietnam became right into a historic errors. you won't be in a position to blame Ali for lacking patriotism taking a place which has shown to be good. the U. S. forces commited war crimes like stripping off leaves through poisonous chemical components, poisoning great areas of the country, there have been crimes against humanity like the bloodbath of My Lai. They carried the war to Cambodia, destroying platforms of a rustic that have been noted as "Paradise of Southeast Asia". Hundred 1000's of lifeless....for what? immediately in Vietnam they have loose economy, you will pay in US$ distant places money. although the U. S. has lost the war! The war became into contraproductive for US coverage. So do no longer blame Ali!
2016-12-29 18:37:15 · answer #2 · answered by cassone 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because one's an Ahole and the other one is a bigger Ahole....
They really thought they could replicate the 1991 Iraq war. They underestimated the desperate and depicable measures those terrorists will stoop to in using the poor and uneducated to kill themselves and others.
For all that say the war is justifiable and watching us bombs innocent familes and kids - put yourselves in their shoes - what would you do? What if someone was dropping bombs all over your neighborhood killind kids - how would you react? You say they are harboring terrorists - true, but you really think the have a choice????
2007-10-19 09:58:53 · answer #3 · answered by g_for_G 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry, how exactly did they "ruin morale" for generations?
So far as I can tell the only people with a low morale are the Democrats. Thats simply because he hasn't given them any new entitlements for the past 7 years. Sadly that will change when Hillary gets into office.
2007-10-19 09:23:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
you must be referring to the pelosi/reid regimes invention of unilateral surrender. nothing demoralizes a military like a has been politician declaring surrender before a war is even over. bush and cheney have done a hurclean effort despite the constant grandstanding and posturing of the pelosi/reid regime for polticial favor and have accomplished much when compared to the 11 percent congress.
2007-10-19 09:27:36 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You must have awakened from a deep sleep from 1992-2000. That's Bill Clinton that did that.
2007-10-19 09:33:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Go to Iraq and stand in the middle of a platton of Marines and ask that question.
2007-10-19 09:23:45 · answer #7 · answered by woodster 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Ask us when you get out of middle school kid.
2007-10-19 10:32:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
oil
2007-10-19 09:50:06 · answer #9 · answered by ati-atihan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
their philosophy is: we have the best military so we'll use it
2007-10-19 09:22:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋