Do you trust your own government on combating poverty?

Question

I just want to hear your comments and point of view. To what extent do you rely on your government when it comes to combating or reducing poverty? Or do you believe that world trade economics and globalization will create greater impact and progression in this issue?

What I mean by your 'own' government is your nations government.

What I mean by your 'own' government is your nations government.

What I mean by your 'own' government is your nations government.

Answer 1

I do not rely on my government to combat or reduce poverty. It does not behove them to do so. Poor people are needed to do the menial jobs. One example of many.... A prime way out of poverty is through gaining a good education. Not so long ago govt. decided that the working classes took up a very small proportion of university places. They were encouraged to move into further and then higher education, the minute the numbers were significant they introduced "student loans" no longer was education "free" instead it was means tested. This meant that the middle and upper classes had to pay and the working classes had to choose between accepting the debt the loan produced or foregoing an opportunity to have a better career/earn more money. It has only been a short period of time but already the numbers of workng class entrants is falling. with time we shall be back to the staus quo. As for global trade etc. I doubt this will reduce poverty, capitalism demands the highest profit for the lowest expenditure, they have nothing to gain by reducing the exploitation of the "slave worker". Look at what is happening in the UK, we have a huge inlux of immigrants from EU states, we are being told that they are doing the jobs the indigenous population will not do. This is hogwash, they are taking the jobs that pay a pittance to us and which we cannot live on, but is like a fortune to them compared to the income in their homeland. I know of many Poles who share a one bedroom flat, often in a terrible state of repair where the landlord would rather let it out cheaply than bring it up to standard. 3/4 sharing means the rent is next to nothing individually, much of what they earn is sent back home. These people are effectively still living in poverty. The bigger picture is that it is driving the wage bill down, employers are the main beneficiaries. Government has to maintain financial growth and where capitalism rules poverty has to reign.

Answer 2

Of course not. Jobs combat poverty. Business creates jobs. A pro business invornment combats poverty best. The government? Combat poverty? hahahahahahahaha

Answer 3

The government should not be in the business of combating poverty. Local churches and organizations do a much better job of it.

Answer 4

Hawaii and Massachusetts have the two had it for an prolonged time. even however, Massachusetts is having issues of it. additionally, you won't be able to evaluate small pattern populations of Massachusetts and Hawaii with the entire inhabitants of the completed united states of america. the bigger and extra distinctive the inhabitants is, the extra problems. 3 reasons: government isn't stable at working considerable initiatives. they are inefficient. Even in circumstances the place we want the government to run factor, such because of the fact the protection rigidity, construction roads and bridges, and so forth., they are nevertheless inefficient. government has customary that as quickly because it runs even area of healthcare interior the form of Medicare and Medicaid, it no longer in basic terms shortchanges well being care vendors in money even yet it drives the gadget into the floor and reasons deficits. And now human beings decide for this technique accelerated? There are different undemanding undemanding procedures to advance well being care. One income of the unfastened industry gadget is a usually extra useful allocation of components. one thank you to bigger allocate components is to permit scientific coverage companies to function for the period of state lines so as that they've extra purchasers and can distribute threat extra out, to that end bringing down fees. yet in any different case is by using the courts. many human beings sue well being care vendors, prescribed drugs, and so forth. for nonsense reasons. area of this is via the fact legal experts are waiting to document those fits, understanding that the well being care gadget will settle rather of battling a case in lots of circumstances, whether the well being care gadget became into suitable. this is via the severe fee of litigation. those complaints and settlements reason expenses to bypass up. I even have many extra reasons, yet there is 3.

Answer 5

The more you expect from government the more you will be disappointed.
If poor people didn't exist, the govt would have to invent them. How else would programs designed to help the poor justify their existence.
This is the whole point. Do these agencies really help the poor, or just help their employees and managers by insuring them a steady paycheck.

Answer 6

i would say the majority of left wings and some independants are trying to combat poverty albeit inneffective in the long term...globalization will bring America's currency on level playing ground witheveryone elses...depending on with which currency we assimilate with first...ultimately the dollar would be worth about as much as a peso but we're talking decades in the future.

Answer 7

I wouldn't trust my United States government to do anything right. -RKO- 10/19/07

Answer 8

Out-sourcing jobs is for the benefit of big corporations(to us globalization) and means less jobs here. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out who this govt is siding with.

Answer 9

Never trust the government on anything.

Answer 10

About as much as You trust Yours~Now that hit close to home