2007-10-19 07:29:10 · 5 answers · asked by Giggly Giraffe 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The states where this has occured ... well it's statutory rape if a girl under 14 year's old has sex ... and well, the school board's have willing opened the can of worms against statory rape.
2007-10-19 07:30:16 · update #1
i think they should be, that is the worst decision i have ever heard a school board make. they can't sign their kids up for medical services because they will always be worried what they are handing their children out. that is the decision of the parents not a bunch of strangers. and a parent needs to know what their child is taking. if that child has to go to the hospital, the doctors need to know exactly what the patient is on, and if the child is unconscious, the parents will have no idea their child is on this, not to mention all the risks, giving a child that young a hormone, what if they have an allergic reaction. that is also not teaching safe sex, what about std's, a kid doesn't worry about that, if they know they can't get pregnant, they won't even worry about the other problems. that is taking the rights away from parents, i would fight it all the way if my child was attending that school, and if nothing came from my protests, then i would take the child out of the school altogether.
2007-10-20 12:53:31 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
do no longer advise to burst your bubble there, yet youngsters those days start up having intercourse at 10 y.o. for a number of them. a number of my previous pupils had babies and that i'm speaking right here approximately 14-15 y.o. women... So, particularly, considering the fact that lots of dad and mom count purely on college for intercourse ed. i think of if we are able to sidestep some teenager pregnancies, then that's good. be attentive to that pills are not dispensed like candies. they're given by potential of the nurse and the nurse sits down with the babies and have a severe communicate with them. the difficulty with youngsters those days is the shortcoming of training and the main suitable intercourse training they are able to get is from their dad and mom. in the event that they provide up on their youngsters, the faculties would be unable to "save" them. all of it starts at residing house.
2016-10-13 04:59:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, giving kids birth control is not the same as having sex with them. Second, giving kids birth control is not the same as making them have sex. There is no reason to believe that making birth control available will make kids more inclined to have sex.
It does allow those who decide to do it to protect themselves when they decide to do it.
And your concept of statutory rape is completely flawed.
2007-10-19 07:54:10 · answer #3 · answered by I 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I hope someone sues that school board and wins BIG!
2007-10-19 07:41:39 · answer #4 · answered by PATRICIA MS 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The school board is to be commended. if the parents won't take responsibility on this issue, then someone else has to.
2007-10-19 07:41:03 · answer #5 · answered by TedEx 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋