Sort of like political cancer I would say.
2007-10-19 07:24:03 · 9 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
here to help (below) Agreed. Hillary is the opposite side of the same coin that Bush is pressed from.
2007-10-19 07:32:36 · update #1
mville28 (below) I agree that Bush is not the face of all Republicans. I disagree that his being elected by them has no repercussions on the party as a whole.
2007-10-19 07:34:52 · update #2
The party is fine. Its just that the media has equated Bush with all Republicans. That's not necessarily the case.
2007-10-19 07:31:51 · answer #1 · answered by Happy Mom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neoconservatism is a logical result of what Republicans have always stood for since the second world war with as absolute bottom point the Reagan social massacre and foreign policy hypocrisy. Later came Newt with the classic tax scheme reinvented. The Necons are nothing new and I don't believe America needs "real" conservatives. America needs a push to the left.
By underfunding vital government services to the brink of collapse they show government is inefficient and the free market is always better. They don't fund properly and then use the inevitable poor service as a reason to fund it even less or even abolish it.
The only thing the American right is good at is PR because the above example of perverse power politics isn't recognized as such by most Americans but welcomed as the hollow low taxes rhetoric. Facts are Republicans are for big money and don't care about ordinary Americans whether they are Democrats or Republicans
2007-10-19 07:38:05 · answer #2 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To neoconservative management, the Republican occasion is expendable see you later because it executes the Likud time table of regime substitute in Iraq, Iran and Syria. they seem to possess Hillary and Rudy, too, by using Rupert Murdoch. To neocon electorate, they don't have a clue what's particularly occurring.
2016-10-13 04:58:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All a part of the plan,Hillary is no different than Bush. the dynasty will continue
2007-10-19 07:29:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They were trying to change it. To change something is, in effect, to destroy it. You destroy what it was, and rebuild it into something else. Liberals have undertaken the same process with America, but haven't got very far with the rebuilding bit...
2007-10-19 09:54:32 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because they're Zionist Jews devoted to One World Dictatorship and the Democratic leadership is exactly the same . They plan the ruination of America and Western civilization
2007-10-19 08:04:34 · answer #6 · answered by John M 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Con-artists do not infiltrate the ghetto to launch their get-rich-quick schemes.
2007-10-19 07:39:40 · answer #7 · answered by T S 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
MONEY IS THEIR CANCER -- THEY WILL BELIVE ANYTHING MONEY SAYS AND MONEY SAID YOU HAVE THE POWER SCREW THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
2007-10-19 08:38:25 · answer #8 · answered by dadw5boys 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dunno why, but it's been fun to watch.
2007-10-19 07:27:42 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋