2007-10-19 07:17:39 · 6 answers · asked by Brain 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
There would be no point in succeeding if you could not survive to enjoy it.
2007-10-19 07:22:38 · answer #1 · answered by Easy B Me II 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why can't one have both? Survival, although necessary, is not the only thing one can do. Some would argue that to survive is to succeed. But everyone's definition of success is different. To survive is to live, but not to have all the wonderful things in life. Well, not always, that is. For some, survival doesn't just cover the things that they need and have, but the television, the radio, and other things that people believe they need.
2007-10-19 14:24:22 · answer #2 · answered by third_syren_of_seduction 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd actually like to do both. I want to succeed at survival and live a long and prosperous life.
2007-10-19 14:26:37 · answer #3 · answered by Diane M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In this day and age, you need to be a survivor, in order to succeed.
On the road to success, there are many pitfalls and setbacks,
and if you don't survive these, you don't succeed.
2007-10-19 14:24:52 · answer #4 · answered by macdelanoche 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather survive and help my children suceed in their futures
2007-10-19 14:25:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
survive no doubt
2007-10-19 14:44:43 · answer #6 · answered by ღOMGღ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋