and should be left to the few who know best?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071019/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_attorney_general
Well....I know of at least one very influential world leader who agrees with him 100%. In fact Bush has his full support on virtually all of his policies...from eavesdropping warrantlessly, to warmaking, to torture..etc...
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/hitleryouth/hj-show2.htm
So...please, leave Bush alone, he is our leader and he knows best!!!
2007-10-19 05:44:12 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Secretive government is an anathema to democracy.
Especially for a country that does not torture, of course we don't torture, we just change the definition of the word until we don't
2007-10-19 06:26:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Listening to Bush IS torture. But then I would never agree with him under any circimstances anyway.
And again, torture does not work. It never has.
Its interesting how many people seem to want to justify it. -
but so many of the Bush supporters are barbarians anyway - they like starting wars and torturing people.
2007-10-19 14:30:33 · answer #2 · answered by planksheer 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I agree that
for leaders who try to secretly torture people
who have not even been charged with a crime
in undisclosed locations,
it is probably VERY difficult to discuss in public.
2007-10-19 15:09:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's only difficult if the lie of we don;t torture is continued. I will leave him alone as soon as he is gone.
2007-10-19 13:05:57 · answer #4 · answered by gone 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
agree....
its difficult for him to discuss ANYTHING in public because the cowboy of god texan drawwlllll twaiinnnggg and quick reverse giddlydiddly english watawahwhatwas i saying??
theres no such installation as guantanamo bay
in irak no such name exist as abu ghraib prison
thus his incompetence in english was misheard and it was the chief of staff that signalled the invasion into irak... not bushie.....
2007-10-19 16:48:01 · answer #5 · answered by Mongol 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL,
I don't trust Bush but I do believe that he has been for the most part, a puppet.
2007-10-19 13:03:41 · answer #6 · answered by Yahoo Sucks 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
To define it we should start doing things to him until he say stop, then that defines what torture is.
2007-10-19 14:04:28 · answer #7 · answered by Jose R 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow it's this kind of thinking that ruins democracy.
2007-10-19 12:51:27 · answer #8 · answered by MattMan 3 · 7⤊ 1⤋
I think It is retarded to be against torture
When proprerly regulated (as I trust America to do) it can be a valuable resource for saving lives.
2007-10-19 12:49:20 · answer #9 · answered by You are all, weirdos. 3 · 2⤊ 8⤋